By organism › Green plants › Poaceae › Avena sativa

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein concentration ranged from 18.6% to 21% among cultivars.

Taxon: Wheat and OatTriticum aestivum Avena sativat0
Outcome: Crude protein concentratione1
Value: 18.6% to 21%e1

Verbatim

e1
“Crude protein concentration ranged from 18.6% to 21% among cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1082

t0
“Wheat and Oat Cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–46

Title

Agronomic Responses of Wheat and Oat Cultivars Under Dual-Purpose and Grain Production Management Strategies

Liliane Severino da Silva; Alexander Coleman; Carlos C. V. García; et al. Crops 2026. doi:10.3390/crops6020027

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was greater for the oat cultivar H578 (7400 kg DM ha-1) than the average of all other cultivars (5100 kg DM ha-1).

Taxon: Wheat and OatTriticum aestivum Avena sativat0
Material: H578e1
Outcome: Grain yielde1
Direction: greatere1
Value: 7400 versus an average of 5100 kg DM ha−1e1
Comparator: all other cultivarse1

Verbatim

e1
“Grain yield was greater for H578 than all other cultivars (7400 versus an average of 5100 kg DM ha−1)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1185

t0
“Wheat and Oat Cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–46

Title

Agronomic Responses of Wheat and Oat Cultivars Under Dual-Purpose and Grain Production Management Strategies

Liliane Severino da Silva; Alexander Coleman; Carlos C. V. García; et al. Crops 2026. doi:10.3390/crops6020027

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was reduced by 27 to 45% under dual-purpose management compared with grain production.

Taxon: Wheat and OatTriticum aestivum Avena sativat0
Treatment: DPe1
Outcome: Grain yielde1
Direction: reductione1
Value: 27 to 45%e1
Comparator: GPe1

Verbatim

e1
“Grain yield reduction for DP ranged from 27 to 45% compared with GP”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1254

t0
“Wheat and Oat Cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–46

Title

Agronomic Responses of Wheat and Oat Cultivars Under Dual-Purpose and Grain Production Management Strategies

Liliane Severino da Silva; Alexander Coleman; Carlos C. V. García; et al. Crops 2026. doi:10.3390/crops6020027

Other claims from this paper (6)

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that selected cultivars (e.g., H578) show potential for use as dual-purpose crops in the region.

Taxon: Wheat and OatTriticum aestivum Avena sativat0
Outcome: potential of selected cultivars (e.g., H578) for use as DP cropse1

Verbatim

e1
“These results demonstrate the potential of selected cultivars (e.g., H578) for use as DP crops in the region”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1364

t0
“Wheat and Oat Cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–46

Title

Agronomic Responses of Wheat and Oat Cultivars Under Dual-Purpose and Grain Production Management Strategies

Liliane Severino da Silva; Alexander Coleman; Carlos C. V. García; et al. Crops 2026. doi:10.3390/crops6020027

Other claims from this paper (6)

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The liming-related increases in alfalfa-brome were linked to higher N uptake in subsequent wheat and oat crops.

Taxon: wheat and oatTriticum aestivum Avena sativae0
Treatment: liming under NPKS and PKS treatmentse0
Outcome: N uptakee0
Direction: highere0

Verbatim

e0
“Alfalfa–brome yields, N, P, and cation uptake increased significantly with liming under NPKS and PKS treatments and were linked to higher N uptake in subsequent wheat and oat crops”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–978

Title

Perennial legume forages drive soil acidification and nitrogen availability to subsequent crops in a cereal–forage rotation

Jedida Chirchir; Miles Dyck; Linda Yuya Gorim Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2026. doi:10.1139/cjps-2025-0168

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differential metabolites between intercropping and A. sativa were inclined to be chemically defensive.

Taxon: A. sativaAvena sativae1
Treatment: intercroppinge1
Outcome: inclined to be chemically defensivee1

Verbatim

e1
“The differential metabolites between intercropping and A. sativa were inclined to be chemically defensive”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1358

Title

Intercropping reshapes soil stress resistance and growth promotion capabilities through rhizosphere exudates in conjunction with the microbiome

Jing Wang; ChunLi Bai; Yonglei Tian; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2026. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1708938

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh matter yield at harvest was reduced by 31.7% under grain + forage compared with grain only (P < 0.05).

Taxon: barley, triticale, oat, and wheatHordeum vulgare Triticum aestivum×TriticosecaleAvena sativae0
Treatment: grain + foragee1
Outcome: fresh mattere1
Direction: reducede1
Value: 31.7%e1
Comparator: grain onlye1

Verbatim

e0
“four crops (barley, triticale, oat, and wheat)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–430

e1
“The fresh matter and dry matter yields at harvest of grain + forage were reduced ( P < 0.05) by 31.7% and 21.5% compared with those of grain only, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–916

Title

Balancing grain and forage production in dual-purpose cereals: physiological basis, yield variation, and economic evaluation

Dan Wu; Yuanyan Meng; Xianfu Lv; et al. BMC Plant Biology 2026. doi:10.1186/s12870-026-08446-5

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter yield at harvest was reduced by 21.5% under grain + forage compared with grain only (P < 0.05).

Taxon: barley, triticale, oat, and wheatHordeum vulgare Triticum aestivum×TriticosecaleAvena sativae0
Treatment: grain + foragee1
Outcome: dry matter yieldse1
Direction: reducede1
Value: 21.5%e1
Comparator: grain onlye1

Verbatim

e0
“four crops (barley, triticale, oat, and wheat)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–430

e1
“The fresh matter and dry matter yields at harvest of grain + forage were reduced ( P < 0.05) by 31.7% and 21.5% compared with those of grain only, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–916

Title

Balancing grain and forage production in dual-purpose cereals: physiological basis, yield variation, and economic evaluation

Dan Wu; Yuanyan Meng; Xianfu Lv; et al. BMC Plant Biology 2026. doi:10.1186/s12870-026-08446-5

Other claims from this paper (10)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The factor analysis model based on 13 photosynthetic and antioxidant indicators ordered the seasons season 1 > season 2 > season 3.

Taxon: barley, triticale, oat, and wheatHordeum vulgare Triticum aestivum×TriticosecaleAvena sativae0
Outcome: factor analysis modele1
Value: season 1 > season 2 > season 3e1
Qualifier: based on seasone1

Verbatim

e0
“four crops (barley, triticale, oat, and wheat)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–430

e1
“The factor analysis model constructed based on photosynthetic and antioxidant indicators (13 indicators) was ordered season 1 > season 2 > season 3 based on season, oat > wheat > triticale > barley based on crop, and grain only > grain + forage based on cropping system”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1187

Title

Balancing grain and forage production in dual-purpose cereals: physiological basis, yield variation, and economic evaluation

Dan Wu; Yuanyan Meng; Xianfu Lv; et al. BMC Plant Biology 2026. doi:10.1186/s12870-026-08446-5

Other claims from this paper (10)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The factor analysis model ordered the crops oat > wheat > triticale > barley.

Taxon: barley, triticale, oat, and wheatHordeum vulgare Triticum aestivum×TriticosecaleAvena sativae0
Outcome: factor analysis modele1
Value: oat > wheat > triticale > barleye1
Qualifier: based on crope1

Verbatim

e0
“four crops (barley, triticale, oat, and wheat)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–430

e1
“The factor analysis model constructed based on photosynthetic and antioxidant indicators (13 indicators) was ordered season 1 > season 2 > season 3 based on season, oat > wheat > triticale > barley based on crop, and grain only > grain + forage based on cropping system”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1187

Title

Balancing grain and forage production in dual-purpose cereals: physiological basis, yield variation, and economic evaluation

Dan Wu; Yuanyan Meng; Xianfu Lv; et al. BMC Plant Biology 2026. doi:10.1186/s12870-026-08446-5

Other claims from this paper (10)

Avena sativa 39,201 claims

39,201 claims