Claim · model-written summary
Winter wheat field germination was nearly the same under control and Vitavax 200 FF, at 90.0–90.2%.
Verbatim
e0“the average field germination under control and in the case with the Vitavax 200 FF treating agent was practically the same and amounted to 90,0–90,2 %”
t0“winter wheat”
Title
V.V. Bezpalko; S.V. Stankevych; L.V. Zhukova; et al. CyberLeninK (CyberLeninka)
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Microwave seed treatment gave slightly lower laboratory sprouting energy and germinating power than Vitavax FF.
- Intervention effect Irradiation followed by Mars EL increased winter wheat sprouting energy and germinating power by 2%.
- Association Spring barley sowing quality varied with presowing method and variety.
- Intervention effect Combined microwave irradiation and growth regulators improved winter wheat sowing qualities.
- Intervention effect Combined microwave irradiation and growth regulators improved spring barley sowing qualities.
- Intervention effect Combined microwave irradiation and growth regulators improved winter wheat field germination.
- Intervention effect Combined microwave irradiation and growth regulators improved spring barley field germination.
- Intervention effect Under unfavorable 2012 conditions, Vitavax 200 FF increased winter wheat field germination 7.8% relative to control.
- Intervention effect Microwave irradiation at 1.8 kW/kg for 15 seconds increased winter wheat field germination by 6.9%.
- Intervention effect Microwave irradiation at 0.9 kW/kg for 45 seconds increased winter wheat field germination by 7.4%.
- Intervention effect Microwave treatment followed by Mars EL raised winter wheat field germination by 9.1–11.8%.