Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The rooting media did not differ significantly in rooting of blackberry.

A claim from MICROPROPAGATION OF BLACKBERRIES (Rubus sp.) CULTIVARS · 1996

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The rooting media did not differ significantly in rooting of blackberry.

Taxon
Rubus sp.Rubust0
Treatment
rooting mediae3
Outcome
Rootinge3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BLACKBERRIES (Rubus sp.) CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–54
e3

“Rooting was succesfully achived with 100% rooted plants in all cultivars, with no differences significant differences among rooting media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–883

Title

MICROPROPAGATION OF BLACKBERRIES (Rubus sp.) CULTIVARS

Vera Lúcia Bobrowski; Paulo Mello-Farias; José Petters Current Agricultural Science and Technology 1996. doi:10.18539/cast.v2i1.146

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-002dda98ab7394fa3fc8385829fad871fe7bf84de7274e8570350711ad157f68 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

in vitro · growth · Rubus (bramble)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.