Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Four irrigations yielded 51.03 q/ha straw, significantly more than most schedules except five irrigations.

A claim from Yield Maximization of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars through Improved Water Management Strategy · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Four irrigations yielded 51.03 q/ha straw, significantly more than most schedules except five irrigations.

Treatment
irrigation water at four different growths stages (CRI, tillering, jointing and booting stage (I4))e0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
moree0
Value
51.03 q/hae0
Comparator
other allotted subplots treatments, except I5e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of irrigation water at four different growths stages (CRI, tillering, jointing and booting stage (I4)), gave significantly more grain (35.65 q/ha) and straw (51.03 q/ha) yield compared to other allotted subplots treatments, except I5.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1513
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–50

Title

Yield Maximization of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars through Improved Water Management Strategy

Dhiman Mukherjee International Journal of Bioresource Science 2016. doi:10.5958/2454-9541.2016.00017.7

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-013bd12f30925e782fc8668b66e89f53ae692715c7bd00037f149e561ee1c273 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.