Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Dry matter, crude protein and neutral detergent fiber digestibility were greater for ENO than CON in week 1; differences were smaller by week 6.

A claim from The effects of feeding α-amylase-enhanced corn silage with different dietary starch concentrations to lactating dairy cows on milk production, nutrient digestibility, and blood metabolites · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter, crude protein and neutral detergent fiber digestibility were greater for ENO than CON in week 1; differences were smaller by week 6.

Treatment
ENOe1
Outcome
Dry matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fibere1
Direction
greatere1
Qualifier
during wk 1, but differences were less by wk 6e1
Comparator
CONe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn silage is one of the most common ingredients fed to dairy cattle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–69
e1

“Dry matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, and starch digestibility were all greater for ENO than CON during wk 1, but differences were less by wk 6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1981–2138

Title

The effects of feeding α-amylase-enhanced corn silage with different dietary starch concentrations to lactating dairy cows on milk production, nutrient digestibility, and blood metabolites

K.C. Krogstad; B.J. Bradford Journal of Dairy Science 2023. doi:10.3168/jds.2022-23030

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-04afb1d6867f7a6b34d30615162073f0b4a11ea6f86c889f7bcd51f4696841a9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Zea mays subsp. mays · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

processing · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.