Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Balanced fertilizer level L3 gave the highest vitamin C, 57.8 and 56.7 mg per 100 ml juice.

A claim from EFFECT OF BALANCED FERTILIZER SPLITTING ON NAVEL ORANGE YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Balanced fertilizer level L3 gave the highest vitamin C, 57.8 and 56.7 mg per 100 ml juice.

Taxon
navel orangeCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
balanced fertilizer level (L3)e1
Outcome
vitamin Ce1
Direction
higheste1
Value
57.8 and 56.7 mg /100 ml juicee1
Comparator
farmer treatmente5
Setting
Metobas District, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments were applied to mature navel orange trees which cultivated under the conditions of Metobas District, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–552
e1

“The balanced fertilizer level (L3) had the highest values of chlorophyll A (89.9 and 94.1 μg/ cm2), chlorophyll B (71.8 and 75.7 μg/cm2), total chlorophyll (161.7 and 169.8 μg / cm2), nitrogen (2.62, and 2.62%), phosphorus (0.054 and0.057%) , potassium (1.67 and 2%), for leaves , fruit set (6.4, and 6.4%), fruit yield (138.2 and 133.5 kg/ tree/ year), soluble solid content (SSC ) (11.5% and 11.8%), acidity (0.98 and 0.97%), vitamin C (V.C) (57.8 and 56.7 mg /100 ml juice), reducing sugars (4.2, and 4.2%) and total sugars (7.4 and 7.3%) in the first and second seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1612
e5

“compared to the farmer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–373

Title

EFFECT OF BALANCED FERTILIZER SPLITTING ON NAVEL ORANGE YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY

A. S. M. El-Saady; A. A. El-Abd Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2012. doi:10.21608/jssae.2012.53324

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-064c3dbdc4e9d01739df737ba729b1e1cfe532c707417b6c952c9a587cfc0998 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.