Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Influence of combined use of organic, inorganic and biological sources of nutrients in sweet orange

S. V. Gholap; SG Bharad; PL Deshmukh; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation entitled “Influence of combined use of organic, inorganic and biological sources of nutrients in Sweet orange” was carried out to find out the suitable combinations of organic, inorganic manures, bio-fertilizers for higher yield and better fruit quality in sweet orange. A field experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) during 2011-2013 with nine treatments replicated thrice. The yield contributing characteristics viz., number of flower Shoot-1, number of fruit Shoot-1 and fruit set per cent influenced significantly due to different nutrient management treatments. The maximum fruit yield was recorded in treatment T7 (75% Rec. N (900 g N/tree) + 25 % N through Neem cake + Bio fertilizers (AM +PSB @ 100 g/tree). The fruit chemical parameters i.e., highest TSS was recorded in treatment T5 (75% Rec. N (900 g N/tree) + 25 % N through FYM + Bio-fertilizers (AM+PSB @ 100 g/tree) while highest ascorbic acid content was recorded in treatment T8 (100% Rec. N, P&K (1200:400:400 g NPK/tree) + Bio fertilizers (AM+PSB @100 g/tree). As in treatment T8 (100% Rec. N,P&K (1200:400:400 g NPK/tree) + Bio fertilizers (AM+PSB @ 100 g/tree) had highest B:C ratio because of no organics which resulted in lowering the cost and ultimately reflecting higher B: C ratio.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient management significantly affected flower number, fruit number and fruit set in sweet orange.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
different nutrient management treatmentse0
Outcome
number of flower Shoot-1, number of fruit Shoot-1 and fruit set per cente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield contributing characteristics viz., number of flower Shoot-1, number of fruit Shoot-1 and fruit set per cent influenced significantly due to different nutrient management treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–610 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T7 gave maximum sweet orange fruit yield.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
T7 (75% Rec. N (900 g N/tree) + 25 % N through Neem cake + Bio fertilizers (AM +PSB @ 100 g/tree)e0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum fruit yield was recorded in treatment T7 (75% Rec. N (900 g N/tree) + 25 % N through Neem cake + Bio fertilizers (AM +PSB @ 100 g/tree).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T5 gave the highest sweet orange total soluble solids.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
T5 (75% Rec. N (900 g N/tree) + 25 % N through FYM + Bio-fertilizers (AM+PSB @ 100 g/tree)e0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest TSS was recorded in treatment T5 (75% Rec. N (900 g N/tree) + 25 % N through FYM + Bio-fertilizers (AM+PSB @ 100 g/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T8 gave the highest sweet orange ascorbic acid content.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
T8 (100% Rec. N, P&K (1200:400:400 g NPK/tree) + Bio fertilizers (AM+PSB @100 g/tree)e0
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest ascorbic acid content was recorded in treatment T8 (100% Rec. N, P&K (1200:400:400 g NPK/tree) + Bio fertilizers (AM+PSB @100 g/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T8 gave the highest benefit-cost ratio because it omitted organics and reduced cost.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
T8 (100% Rec. N,P&K (1200:400:400 g NPK/tree) + Bio fertilizers (AM+PSB @ 100 g/tree)e0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
because of no organicse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment T8 (100% Rec. N,P&K (1200:400:400 g NPK/tree) + Bio fertilizers (AM+PSB @ 100 g/tree) had highest B:C ratio because of no organics which resulted in lowering the cost and ultimately reflecting higher B: C ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results differ

48 papers: 39 positive, 9 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
    AS+DMPP raised fruit yield.

    Use of Nitrification Inhibitor DMPP to Improve Nitrogen Uptake Efficiency in Citrus Trees · 2013 · compared with ammonium sulphate (AS) and calcium-potassium nitrate (CPN)

    Same direction

  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 54 positive, 2 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · quality: phytochemicals · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.