Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Studies on effect of foliar application of urea, zinc sulphate and 2,4-D on quality parameters of sweet orange Var. Nucellar (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck)

AD Bhosale; MB Patil; KA Bhalerao; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to studies on effect of foliar application of urea, zinc sulphate and 2,4-D on quality parameters of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) Var. Nucellar.” was carried out at Sweet Orange Research Station, Badnapur, Dist. Jalna during 2018-19.The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with 8 treatments and three replication. Observations were recorded on quality characters of sweet orange. The results were revealed that, the quality parameters like reducing sugar, non-reducing sugar, acidity, T.S.S, ascorbic acid, pH, total sugar, are most effective in (T7) Urea – 1% + ZnSO4 -0.4% + 2,4-D – 20ppm followed by treatment (T6) ZnSO4 -0.4% + 2,4-D – 20 ppm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar urea 1% + ZnSO4 0.4% + 2,4-D 20 ppm was most effective for reducing sugar, non-reducing sugar and acidity of sweet orange, followed by ZnSO4 0.4% + 2,4-D 20 ppm.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
Urea – 1% + ZnSO4 -0.4% + 2,4-D – 20ppme1
Outcome
reducing sugar, non-reducing sugar, aciditye1
Direction
most effectivee1
Comparator
ZnSO4 -0.4% + 2,4-D – 20 ppme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) Var. Nucellar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–183 · show in text ↑
e1

“reducing sugar, non-reducing sugar, acidity, T.S.S, ascorbic acid, pH, total sugar, are most effective in (T7) Urea – 1% + ZnSO4 -0.4% + 2,4-D – 20ppm followed by treatment (T6) ZnSO4 -0.4% + 2,4-D – 20 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar urea 1% + ZnSO4 0.4% + 2,4-D 20 ppm was most effective for T.S.S, ascorbic acid and pH of sweet orange, followed by ZnSO4 0.4% + 2,4-D 20 ppm.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
Urea – 1% + ZnSO4 -0.4% + 2,4-D – 20ppme1
Outcome
T.S.S, ascorbic acid, pHe1
Direction
most effectivee1
Comparator
ZnSO4 -0.4% + 2,4-D – 20 ppme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) Var. Nucellar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–183 · show in text ↑
e1

“reducing sugar, non-reducing sugar, acidity, T.S.S, ascorbic acid, pH, total sugar, are most effective in (T7) Urea – 1% + ZnSO4 -0.4% + 2,4-D – 20ppm followed by treatment (T6) ZnSO4 -0.4% + 2,4-D – 20 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar urea 1% + ZnSO4 0.4% + 2,4-D 20 ppm was most effective for total sugar of sweet orange, followed by ZnSO4 0.4% + 2,4-D 20 ppm.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
Urea – 1% + ZnSO4 -0.4% + 2,4-D – 20ppme1
Outcome
total sugare1
Direction
most effectivee1
Comparator
ZnSO4 -0.4% + 2,4-D – 20 ppme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) Var. Nucellar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–183 · show in text ↑
e1

“reducing sugar, non-reducing sugar, acidity, T.S.S, ascorbic acid, pH, total sugar, are most effective in (T7) Urea – 1% + ZnSO4 -0.4% + 2,4-D – 20ppm followed by treatment (T6) ZnSO4 -0.4% + 2,4-D – 20 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–707 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · quality: phytochemicals · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: phytochemicals · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

2,4-D · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.