Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar urea 1% + ZnSO4 0.4% + 2,4-D 20 ppm was most effective for total sugar of sweet orange, followed by ZnSO4 0.4% + 2,4-D 20 ppm.

A claim from Studies on effect of foliar application of urea, zinc sulphate and 2,4-D on quality parameters of sweet orange Var. Nucellar (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar urea 1% + ZnSO4 0.4% + 2,4-D 20 ppm was most effective for total sugar of sweet orange, followed by ZnSO4 0.4% + 2,4-D 20 ppm.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
Urea – 1% + ZnSO4 -0.4% + 2,4-D – 20ppme1
Outcome
total sugare1
Direction
most effectivee1
Comparator
ZnSO4 -0.4% + 2,4-D – 20 ppme1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) Var. Nucellar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–183
e1

“reducing sugar, non-reducing sugar, acidity, T.S.S, ascorbic acid, pH, total sugar, are most effective in (T7) Urea – 1% + ZnSO4 -0.4% + 2,4-D – 20ppm followed by treatment (T6) ZnSO4 -0.4% + 2,4-D – 20 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–707

Title

Studies on effect of foliar application of urea, zinc sulphate and 2,4-D on quality parameters of sweet orange Var. Nucellar (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck)

AD Bhosale; MB Patil; KA Bhalerao; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i5d.10306

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-0885fdfbd80d028a1c044f832cda3d70a18d2b30f8b845db9ffefbdd05ab5461 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

2,4-D · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.