Paper · 2019 · Menoufia Journal of Plant Production

IMPACT OF ORGANIC AND INORGANIC NITROGEN FERTILIZERS ON WASHINGTON NAVEL ORANGE TREES. I. VEGETATIVE GROWTH, YIELD AND SOIL PROPERTIES

H. A. Ennab; M. A. El Shemy; M. H. Abd El Aziz

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Poultry manure has a salutary effect on soil fertility, increase plant nutrients and improving the soil conditions for citrus growth, productivity and ensure economic yield with a good quality. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted during 2017 and 2018 seasons on 20 year old Washington navel orange trees grown in a private orchard in Kafr El Sheikh Governorate, Egypt. This study aims to evaluating the effect of poultry manure and ammonium sulphate alone or in combination on soil chemical properties, vegetative growth and yield of Washington navel orange trees. The treatments consist of T1 (100% inorganic nitrogen), T2 (66.6% inorganic nitrogen + 33.3% organic nitrogen), T3 (50% inorganic nitrogen + 50% organic nitrogen), T4 (33.3% inorganic nitrogen + 66.6% organic nitrogen) and T5 (100% organic nitrogen). Results indicated that, combined application of organic and inorganic nitrogen fertilizer especially T4 (203.8 kg/feddan ammonium sulphate + 3.64 ton/feddan poultry manure) and T3 (305.8 kg/feddan ammonium sulphate + 2.73 ton/feddan poultry manure) resulted in significant increase in NH4+ N, NO3- N, organic matter and Zn; and decreased pH, cadmium, lead and electrical conductivity of soil. Moreover, the treatments increased leaf content values of N, P, K, Ca, Fe, Mn and Zn in both seasons. Data also indicated that application of 305.8 kg/feddan ammonium sulphate + 2.73 ton/feddan poultry manure (T3) and application of 203.8 kg/feddan ammonium sulphate + 3.64 ton/feddan poultry manure (T4) gave the highest values of tree size and vegetative growth in terms of shoot number/branch, shoot length, leaves number per shoot and leaf area of Washington navel orange trees compared to mineral nitrogen fertilizers only. As for yield and fruit quality, treatment of T3 (50% inorganic nitrogen + 50% organic nitrogen), T4 (33.3% inorganic nitrogen + 66.6% organic nitrogen) produced the highest yield and improve fruit quality in terms of fruit weight, fruit size and fruit firmness. This treatment also increased SSC%, SSC/acid ratio and vitamin C and reduced acidity, nitrate and nitrite in fruit juice. In general, combined application of 305.8 kg/feddan ammonium sulphate + 2.73 ton/feddan poultry manure (T3) was recommended for improving soil chemical properties and the best growth, yield, fruit quality and nutritional status of Washington navel orange trees.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nitrogen applications, especially T4 and T3, increased soil NH4+ N, NO3- N, and organic matter.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treese1
Treatment
T4 (203.8 kg/feddan ammonium sulphate + 3.64 ton/feddan poultry manure)e0
Outcome
NH4+ N, NO3- N, organic mattere0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of organic and inorganic nitrogen fertilizer especially T4 (203.8 kg/feddan ammonium sulphate + 3.64 ton/feddan poultry manure) and T3 (305.8 kg/feddan ammonium sulphate + 2.73 ton/feddan poultry manure) resulted in significant increase in NH4+ N, NO3- N, organic matter and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1146 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area of Washington navel orange trees compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nitrogen applications, especially T4 and T3, increased soil Zn.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treese1
Treatment
T3 (305.8 kg/feddan ammonium sulphate + 2.73 ton/feddan poultry manure)e0
Outcome
Zne0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of organic and inorganic nitrogen fertilizer especially T4 (203.8 kg/feddan ammonium sulphate + 3.64 ton/feddan poultry manure) and T3 (305.8 kg/feddan ammonium sulphate + 2.73 ton/feddan poultry manure) resulted in significant increase in NH4+ N, NO3- N, organic matter and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1146 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area of Washington navel orange trees compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilizers decreased soil pH, cadmium, and lead.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treese2
Treatment
combined application of organic and inorganic nitrogen fertilizere1
Outcome
pH, cadmium, leade0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“decreased pH, cadmium, lead and electrical conductivity of soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1216 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined application of organic and inorganic nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–913 · show in text ↑
e2

“leaf area of Washington navel orange trees compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilizers decreased soil electrical conductivity.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treese2
Treatment
combined application of organic and inorganic nitrogen fertilizere1
Outcome
electrical conductivity of soile0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“decreased pH, cadmium, lead and electrical conductivity of soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1216 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined application of organic and inorganic nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–913 · show in text ↑
e2

“leaf area of Washington navel orange trees compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments increased leaf N, P, and K content in both seasons.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treese1
Treatment
the treatmentse0
Outcome
leaf content values of N, P, Ke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the treatments increased leaf content values of N, P, K, Ca, Fe, Mn and Zn in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1318 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area of Washington navel orange trees compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments increased leaf Ca, Fe, and Mn content in both seasons.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treese1
Treatment
the treatmentse0
Outcome
Ca, Fe, Mne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the treatments increased leaf content values of N, P, K, Ca, Fe, Mn and Zn in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1318 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area of Washington navel orange trees compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments increased leaf Zn content in both seasons.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treese1
Treatment
the treatmentse0
Outcome
Zne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the treatments increased leaf content values of N, P, K, Ca, Fe, Mn and Zn in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1318 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area of Washington navel orange trees compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 and T4 gave highest tree size and shoot number, shoot length, and leaf number versus mineral fertilizer alone.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treese0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
tree size and vegetative growthe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
mineral nitrogen fertilizers onlye0

Verbatim

e0

“application of 305.8 kg/feddan ammonium sulphate + 2.73 ton/feddan poultry manure (T3) and application of 203.8 kg/feddan ammonium sulphate + 3.64 ton/feddan poultry manure (T4) gave the highest values of tree size and vegetative growth in terms of shoot number/branch, shoot length, leaves number per shoot and leaf area of Washington navel orange trees compared to mineral nitrogen fertilizers only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 and T4 produced highest yield.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treese1
Treatment
T3 (50% inorganic nitrogen + 50% organic nitrogen)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“treatment of T3 (50% inorganic nitrogen + 50% organic nitrogen), T4 (33.3% inorganic nitrogen + 66.6% organic nitrogen) produced the highest yield and improve fruit quality in terms of fruit weight, fruit size and fruit firmness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1778–2007 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area of Washington navel orange trees compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 and T4 improved fruit weight, size, and firmness.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treese1
Treatment
T4 (33.3% inorganic nitrogen + 66.6% organic nitrogen)e0
Outcome
fruit weight, fruit size and fruit firmnesse0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“treatment of T3 (50% inorganic nitrogen + 50% organic nitrogen), T4 (33.3% inorganic nitrogen + 66.6% organic nitrogen) produced the highest yield and improve fruit quality in terms of fruit weight, fruit size and fruit firmness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1778–2007 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area of Washington navel orange trees compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment increased SSC%, SSC/acid ratio, and vitamin C.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treese2
Treatment
T3 (50% inorganic nitrogen + 50% organic nitrogen)e1
Outcome
SSC%, SSC/acid ratio and vitamin Ce0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also increased SSC%, SSC/acid ratio and vitamin C and reduced acidity, nitrate and nitrite in fruit juice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2008–2129 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment of T3 (50% inorganic nitrogen + 50% organic nitrogen), T4 (33.3% inorganic nitrogen + 66.6% organic nitrogen) produced the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1778–1924 · show in text ↑
e2

“leaf area of Washington navel orange trees compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment reduced fruit juice acidity, nitrate, and nitrite.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treese2
Treatment
T3 (50% inorganic nitrogen + 50% organic nitrogen)e1
Outcome
acidity, nitrate and nitrite in fruit juicee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also increased SSC%, SSC/acid ratio and vitamin C and reduced acidity, nitrate and nitrite in fruit juice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2008–2129 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment of T3 (50% inorganic nitrogen + 50% organic nitrogen), T4 (33.3% inorganic nitrogen + 66.6% organic nitrogen) produced the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1778–1924 · show in text ↑
e2

“leaf area of Washington navel orange trees compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1707 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended T3 to improve soil chemistry, growth, yield, quality, and nutrition.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treese0
Treatment
305.8 kg/feddan ammonium sulphate + 2.73 ton/feddan poultry manure (T3)e0
Outcome
improving soil chemical properties and the best growth, yield, fruit quality and nutritional statuse0

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of 305.8 kg/feddan ammonium sulphate + 2.73 ton/feddan poultry manure (T3) was recommended for improving soil chemical properties and the best growth, yield, fruit quality and nutritional status of Washington navel orange trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2142–2391 · show in text ↑

ammonium sulfate · nutrient: content · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results differ

48 papers: 39 positive, 9 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.