Paper · 2008 · UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA)

EARLY WINTER SPRAY OF LOW BIURET UREA IMPROVES MARKETABLE YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY OF SWEET ORANGES

Basharat Ali Saleem; Aman Ullah Malik; Mehdi Maqbool; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
8
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the optimum time of low-biuret urea (LBU) applied as a foliar spray to improve marketable yield and fruit quality of Sweet Orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck.) cv Blood Red. Two percent solution of LBU was sprayed on 15 years old plants to the point of run off, on 15 th of October, November and December in 2004. Simple water spray was used as control. Plants selected for the experiment were grafted on rough lemon (Citrus jambhiri Lush.) rootstock and were grown at University of Agriculture Faisalabad (Latitude 31° 25' North; Longitude: 73° 09'), Pakistan. Experiment was laid out in RCBD, using single plant as a treatment unit with three replicates. Foliar spray of 2% LBU on 15 th November, 2004 significantly increased total yield (102%) as well as grade-I fruit yield (75%) compared with control. Fruit quality including pulp colour score (40%), TSS (33%), vitamin C (10%), TSS/TA (19%), sugars (44%) and taste score (37%), of November treated samples were significantly greater as compared to control. Significant decrease in fruit weight, fruit diameter, and number of aborted seeds/fruit was recorded in all the treatments as compared to the highest values in control, followed by the treatments applied on 15 th of December, October and November, 2004 respectively. Highest value of 108.3g for fruit weight and 56.9mm diameter were found in plants treated on 15 th November, 2004. No effect was observed in juice contents, peel weight or acidity with LBU treatments. Overall, foliar spray of 2% LBU applied on 15 th November, 2004, produced better results for improving marketable yield and fruit quality of Blood Red sweet orange.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

November LBU spray increased total yield by 102% versus control.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
Foliar spray of 2% LBU on 15 th November, 2004e0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
102%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray of 2% LBU on 15 th November, 2004 significantly increased total yield (102%) as well as grade-I fruit yield (75%) compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET ORANGES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

November LBU spray increased grade-I fruit yield by 75% versus control.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
Foliar spray of 2% LBU on 15 th November, 2004e0
Outcome
grade-I fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
75%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray of 2% LBU on 15 th November, 2004 significantly increased total yield (102%) as well as grade-I fruit yield (75%) compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET ORANGES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

November treatment increased pulp colour score by 40%.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
November treated samplese0
Outcome
pulp colour scoree0
Direction
greatere0
Value
40%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit quality including pulp colour score (40%), TSS (33%), vitamin C (10%), TSS/TA (19%), sugars (44%) and taste score (37%), of November treated samples were significantly greater as compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET ORANGES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

November treatment increased TSS by 33%.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
November treated samplese0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
33%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit quality including pulp colour score (40%), TSS (33%), vitamin C (10%), TSS/TA (19%), sugars (44%) and taste score (37%), of November treated samples were significantly greater as compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET ORANGES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

November treatment increased vitamin C by 10%.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
November treated samplese0
Outcome
vitamin Ce0
Direction
greatere0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit quality including pulp colour score (40%), TSS (33%), vitamin C (10%), TSS/TA (19%), sugars (44%) and taste score (37%), of November treated samples were significantly greater as compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET ORANGES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

November treatment increased TSS/TA by 19%.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
November treated samplese0
Outcome
TSS/TAe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
19%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit quality including pulp colour score (40%), TSS (33%), vitamin C (10%), TSS/TA (19%), sugars (44%) and taste score (37%), of November treated samples were significantly greater as compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET ORANGES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

November treatment increased sugars by 44%.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
November treated samplese0
Outcome
sugarse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
44%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit quality including pulp colour score (40%), TSS (33%), vitamin C (10%), TSS/TA (19%), sugars (44%) and taste score (37%), of November treated samples were significantly greater as compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET ORANGES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

November treatment increased taste score by 37%.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
November treated samplese0
Outcome
taste scoree0
Direction
greatere0
Value
37%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit quality including pulp colour score (40%), TSS (33%), vitamin C (10%), TSS/TA (19%), sugars (44%) and taste score (37%), of November treated samples were significantly greater as compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET ORANGES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LBU treatments reduced fruit weight relative to control.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant decrease in fruit weight, fruit diameter, and number of aborted seeds/fruit was recorded in all the treatments as compared to the highest values in control, followed by the treatments applied on 15 th of December, October and November, 2004 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET ORANGES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LBU treatments reduced fruit diameter relative to control.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit diametere0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant decrease in fruit weight, fruit diameter, and number of aborted seeds/fruit was recorded in all the treatments as compared to the highest values in control, followed by the treatments applied on 15 th of December, October and November, 2004 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET ORANGES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LBU treatments reduced the number of aborted seeds per fruit relative to control.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Outcome
number of aborted seeds/fruite0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant decrease in fruit weight, fruit diameter, and number of aborted seeds/fruit was recorded in all the treatments as compared to the highest values in control, followed by the treatments applied on 15 th of December, October and November, 2004 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET ORANGES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

November treated plants had the highest treated fruit weight at 108.3g.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
15 th November, 2004e0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
108.3ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest value of 108.3g for fruit weight and 56.9mm diameter were found in plants treated on 15 th November, 2004.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET ORANGES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

November treated plants had the highest treated fruit diameter at 56.9mm.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
15 th November, 2004e0
Outcome
diametere0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
56.9mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest value of 108.3g for fruit weight and 56.9mm diameter were found in plants treated on 15 th November, 2004.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET ORANGES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LBU treatments did not change juice contents, peel weight or acidity.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
LBU treatmentse0
Outcome
juice contents, peel weight or aciditye0
Direction
No effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No effect was observed in juice contents, peel weight or acidity with LBU treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1522 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET ORANGES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors favor 2% LBU spray on 15 November for marketable yield and quality.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise0
Outcome
foliar spray of 2% LBU applied on 15 th November, 2004e0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, foliar spray of 2% LBU applied on 15 th November, 2004, produced better results for improving marketable yield and fruit quality of Blood Red sweet orange.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1687 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results differ

48 papers: 39 positive, 9 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 65 positive, 12 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.