Paper · 1994 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Winter Application of Low-biuret Urea to the Foliage of `Washington' Navel Orange Increased Yield

Anwar G. Ali; Carol J. Lovatt

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
25
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to test whether a single winter prebloom foliar application of low-biuret urea would increase the yield of 30-year-old `Washington' navel orange trees [ Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] on Troyer citrange rootstock [ C. sinensis `Washington' × Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.]. All trees received a winter (November to January) soil application of urea (0.5 kg N/tree). Trees were maintained under irrigation or irrigation was withheld from 1 Oct. to 1 Mar. To determine the optimal time for foliar urea application, trees in both irrigation main plots received one application of low-biuret urea in mid-November, mid-December, mid-January, or mid-February applied at a rate of 0.16 kg N/tree. There was a set of control trees that only received the soil application of urea. Trees receiving foliar-applied urea in mid-January or mid-February, independent of irrigation treatment, had significantly greater yield and fruit number per tree each year than the control trees for 3 consecutive years. The number of fruit with diameters of 6.1 to 8.0 cm increased significantly as yield increased ( r 2 = 0.88). Withholding irrigation from 1 Oct. to 1 Mar. had a negative impact on yield. Annual winter application of low-biuret urea to the foliage did not significantly increase leaf total N at the end of 3 years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-January foliar urea increased orange yield relative to soil-only controls in each of three years, regardless of irrigation treatment.

Taxon
`Washington' Navel Oranget0
Treatment
foliar-applied urea in mid-Januarye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
for 3 consecutive yearse0
Comparator
control treese0

Verbatim

e0

“Trees receiving foliar-applied urea in mid-January or mid-February, independent of irrigation treatment, had significantly greater yield and fruit number per tree each year than the control trees for 3 consecutive years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“`Washington' Navel Orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-January foliar urea increased orange fruit number per tree relative to soil-only controls in each of three years, regardless of irrigation treatment.

Taxon
`Washington' Navel Oranget0
Treatment
foliar-applied urea in mid-Januarye0
Outcome
fruit number per treee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
control treese0

Verbatim

e0

“Trees receiving foliar-applied urea in mid-January or mid-February, independent of irrigation treatment, had significantly greater yield and fruit number per tree each year than the control trees for 3 consecutive years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“`Washington' Navel Orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-February foliar urea increased orange yield relative to soil-only controls in each of three years, regardless of irrigation treatment.

Taxon
`Washington' Navel Oranget0
Treatment
foliar-applied urea in mid-January or mid-Februarye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
control treese0

Verbatim

e0

“Trees receiving foliar-applied urea in mid-January or mid-February, independent of irrigation treatment, had significantly greater yield and fruit number per tree each year than the control trees for 3 consecutive years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“`Washington' Navel Orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-February foliar urea increased orange fruit number per tree relative to soil-only controls in each of three years, regardless of irrigation treatment.

Taxon
`Washington' Navel Oranget0
Treatment
foliar-applied urea in mid-January or mid-Februarye0
Outcome
fruit number per treee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
control treese0

Verbatim

e0

“Trees receiving foliar-applied urea in mid-January or mid-February, independent of irrigation treatment, had significantly greater yield and fruit number per tree each year than the control trees for 3 consecutive years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“`Washington' Navel Orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of orange fruit 6.1 to 8.0 cm in diameter rose with yield.

Taxon
`Washington' Navel Oranget0
Outcome
number of fruit with diameters of 6.1 to 8.0 cme0
Direction
increasede0
Value
r 2 = 0.88e0
Comparator
yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“The number of fruit with diameters of 6.1 to 8.0 cm increased significantly as yield increased ( r 2 = 0.88)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“`Washington' Navel Orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding irrigation from October through March reduced orange yield.

Taxon
`Washington' Navel Oranget0
Treatment
Withholding irrigation from 1 Oct. to 1 Mar.e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
negative impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Withholding irrigation from 1 Oct. to 1 Mar. had a negative impact on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“`Washington' Navel Orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual winter foliar urea did not significantly increase leaf total nitrogen after three years.

Taxon
`Washington' Navel Oranget0
Treatment
Annual winter application of low-biuret urea to the foliagee0
Outcome
leaf total Ne0
Direction
did not significantly increasee0
Qualifier
at the end of 3 yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Annual winter application of low-biuret urea to the foliage did not significantly increase leaf total N at the end of 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1335 · show in text ↑
t0

“`Washington' Navel Orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–81 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results differ

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results differ

48 papers: 39 positive, 9 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

irrigation · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 20 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

application · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 65 positive, 12 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.