Intervention effectmodel-written summary

30 kg Zn ha−1 plus 2.5 kg Fe ha−1 increased wheat grain Fe concentration by 100%.

A claim from Agronomy biofortification of wheat grain in a saline and calcareous soil · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

30 kg Zn ha−1 plus 2.5 kg Fe ha−1 increased wheat grain Fe concentration by 100%.

Treatment
30 kg Zn ha−1 and 2.5 kg Fe ha−1e0
Outcome
concentration of Fee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results clarified that the fertilizer application of 30 kg Zn ha−1 and 2.5 kg Fe ha−1 can be proportionally and simultaneously increased the concentration of Fe and Zn in wheat grain by 100%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1703–1898
t0

“Agronomy biofortification of wheat grain in a saline and calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72

Title

Agronomy biofortification of wheat grain in a saline and calcareous soil

Ali Reza Jafarnejadi; Fatemeh Meskini-Vishkaee Journal of Plant Nutrition 2024. doi:10.1080/01904167.2024.2354186

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-0a6612f9a67cd2be704267f7a1d08dc340b273a40f8b8f2b55f6ed5b2758184f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

111 papers: 85 positive, 26 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this claim · 25 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

102 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

iron atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.