Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium and PSB seed treatment improved stover yield to 2709 kg ha−1.

A claim from Yield, Protein Content, Nutrient (N, P and K) Content and their Uptake in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as Influenced by Graded Levels of Fertilizers and Bio-Fertilizers · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium and PSB seed treatment improved stover yield to 2709 kg ha−1.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Rhizobium and PSB both as seed treatmente0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
stover yieldse0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
2709 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizobium and PSB both as seed treatment (B4) showed significant improvement in seed yield (1824 kg ha−1) and stover yields (2709 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–833
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103

Title

Yield, Protein Content, Nutrient (N, P and K) Content and their Uptake in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as Influenced by Graded Levels of Fertilizers and Bio-Fertilizers

Dinesh Kumar; L. K. Arvadiya; Anita Kumawat; et al. Trends in Biosciences/Trends in biosciences 2014

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-0c9d2edcefb2fcf00f03513a43cfcee9ba02380566cddd1f47846e844bce90db · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

120 papers: 116 positive, 4 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    In a chickpea pot experiment, combining Rhizobium inoculation with seed priming had little effect on yield.

    The improvement of crop yield in marginal environments using ‘on-farm’ seed priming: nodulation, nitrogen fixation, and disease resistance · 2005

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation had no effect on chickpea yield.

    Growth and yield of two chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) varieties in Canterbury, New Zealand · 1995

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation did not significantly change crop biomass, grain yield or harvest index of chickpea compared with the non-inoculated control.

    Growth and yield response of chickpea to Rhizobium inoculation: productivity in relation to interception of radiation · 2015 · compared with non-inoculated control

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Rhizobium and 10 ppm GA3 treatments gave an almost negative response in yield parameters, with a few exceptions.

    Growth, yield and biochemical responses of BARI chhola-9 (Cicer arietinum L.) to GA3 and rhizobium application · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Single, dual, and triple bacterial inoculations significantly increased pod number versus control in controlled and field trials.

    Influence of Nitrogen Fixing and Phosphorus Solubilizing Bacteria on the Nodulation, Plant Growth, and Yield of Chickpea · 2007 · compared with control treatment

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Combined Rhizobium and GA3 at 10−5 M enhanced chickpea grain yield by up to 39%.

    The Combined Effects of Gibberellic Acid and Rhizobium on Growth, Yield and Nutritional Status in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2021

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Rhizobium + PSB inoculation enhanced yield attributes, grain and straw yields in chickpea

    Effect ofRhizobiumand Phosphate Solubilizing Bacterial Inoculants on Symbiotic Traits, Nodule Leghemoglobin, and Yield of Chickpea Genotypes · 2013

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Inoculation increased pod number by 28% over control.

    Effect of chickpea in association with Rhizobium to crop productivity and soil fertility · 2016 · compared with control plant

    Same direction

111 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

90 papers: 82 positive, 8 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    First-season priming caused complete chickpea yield loss at both sites.

    A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF MICRONUTRIENT SEED PRIMING AND SOIL FERTILIZATION ON THE MINERAL NUTRITION OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum), LENTIL (Lens culinaris), RICE (Oryza sativa) AND WHEAT (Triticum aestivum) IN NEPAL · 2005

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    In a chickpea pot experiment, combining Rhizobium inoculation with seed priming had little effect on yield.

    The improvement of crop yield in marginal environments using ‘on-farm’ seed priming: nodulation, nitrogen fixation, and disease resistance · 2005

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Hydropriming treatments did not differ significantly for number of seed per pod, number of empty pod, seed thousand weight in chickpea.

    Effect of different hydropriming times on the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2011 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Adding molybdenum alone to priming water did not significantly improve chickpea yield over the control.

    Molybdenum response of chickpea in the High Barind Tract (HBT) of Bangladesh and in Eastern India. · 2005 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Seed-dressing fungicides did not significantly increase grain yield in the infected plot or in farmers’ fields.

    Sources of resistance to Fusarium wilt of chickpea in Sudan · 2002

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Neither seed dressing significantly increased grain yield.

    Sources of resistance to Fusarium wilt of chickpea in Sudan · 2002

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Without priming the stover yield was the lowest, at 2.40 t ha-1.

    EFFECT OF ORGANIC SEED PRIMING ON YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTING TRAITS OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.) IN DROUGHT PRONE AREA · 2023

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Beejamrit seed priming gave a slightly lower but statistically identical yield to T5.

    Effect of Seed Priming, Beejamrit, Jeevamrit and Micronutrients on Symbiotic Traits, Growth Attributes, Dehydrogenase Activity, Leghaemoglobin Content, Protein Content and Grain Yield of Chickpea · 2025 · compared with treatment T5

    Opposite direction

81 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.