Abstract
A field study was undertaken during winter (rabi) season of 2013–2014 to explore the effect of graded levels of fertilizers and bio-fertilizers on yield of chickpea, protein content in chickpea seeds and nutrient uptake by the crop. Significantly higher seed and stover yields (1854, 2722 kg ha−1, respectively) were recorded with application of fertilizer @ 100% RDF (25: 50: 00, kg N: P: K ha−1). Remarkable improvements in protein content, nutrient content as well as their uptake were also observed with the treatment of 100% RDF. Various treatments of bio-fertilizers also produced significant variation on yield, protein content and nutrient content and uptake by crop. The crop sown with Rhizobium and PSB both as seed treatment (B4) showed significant improvement in seed yield (1824 kg ha−1) and stover yields (2709 kg ha−1) but remained at par with Rhizobium as seed treatment + PSB as soil application (B) and Rhizobium as seed treatment+ VAM as soil application (B3). Considerable improvement in nutrient content and uptake was also noticed under Rhizobium and PSB both as seed treatment (B4). Significantly higher protein content in chickpea seeds was recorded with Rhizobium and PSB both as seed treatment (B4), but it remained at par with Rhizobium as seed treatment + PSB as soil application (B2) and Rhizobium as seed treatment+VAM as soil application
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
100% RDF produced significantly higher chickpea seed yield of 1854 kg ha−1.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- fertilizer @ 100% RDF (25: 50: 00, kg N: P: K ha−1)e0
- Outcome
- seede0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1854e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Significantly higher seed and stover yields (1854, 2722 kg ha−1, respectively) were recorded with application of fertilizer @ 100% RDF (25: 50: 00, kg N: P: K ha−1)”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
100% RDF produced significantly higher chickpea stover yield of 2722 kg ha−1.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- fertilizer @ 100% RDF (25: 50: 00, kg N: P: K ha−1)e0
- Outcome
- stover yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2722 kg ha−1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Significantly higher seed and stover yields (1854, 2722 kg ha−1, respectively) were recorded with application of fertilizer @ 100% RDF (25: 50: 00, kg N: P: K ha−1)”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
100% RDF improved seed protein content.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- improvementse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Remarkable improvements in protein content, nutrient content as well as their uptake were also observed with the treatment of 100% RDF”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
100% RDF improved nutrient content and uptake.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- nutrient content as well as their uptakee0
- Direction
- improvementse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Remarkable improvements in protein content, nutrient content as well as their uptake were also observed with the treatment of 100% RDF”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer treatments significantly varied chickpea yield, protein content, nutrient content and uptake.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Outcome
- significant variation on yield, protein content and nutrient content and uptakee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Various treatments of bio-fertilizers also produced significant variation on yield, protein content and nutrient content and uptake by crop”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium and PSB seed treatment improved seed yield to 1824 kg ha−1.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Rhizobium and PSB both as seed treatmente0
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- improvemente0
- Value
- 1824 kg ha−1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Rhizobium and PSB both as seed treatment (B4) showed significant improvement in seed yield (1824 kg ha−1)”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium and PSB seed treatment improved stover yield to 2709 kg ha−1.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Rhizobium and PSB both as seed treatmente0
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- stover yieldse0
- Direction
- improvemente0
- Value
- 2709 kg ha−1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Rhizobium and PSB both as seed treatment (B4) showed significant improvement in seed yield (1824 kg ha−1) and stover yields (2709 kg ha−1)”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed yield under combined Rhizobium and PSB seed treatment was at par with seed Rhizobium plus soil PSB and seed Rhizobium plus soil VAM.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- remained at pare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“remained at par with Rhizobium as seed treatment + PSB as soil application (B) and Rhizobium as seed treatment+ VAM as soil application (B3)”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium and PSB seed treatment improved nutrient content and uptake.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Rhizobium and PSB both as seed treatmente0
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- nutrient content and uptakee0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Considerable improvement in nutrient content and uptake was also noticed under Rhizobium and PSB both as seed treatment (B4)”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium and PSB seed treatment significantly increased chickpea seed protein content.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- Rhizobium and PSB both as seed treatmente0
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Significantly higher protein content in chickpea seeds was recorded with Rhizobium and PSB both as seed treatment (B4)”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
116 papers more in this group
See all 120 papers →Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →Rhizobium · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
17 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →seed treatment · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
86 papers more in this group
See all 90 papers →nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
98 papers more in this group
See all 102 papers →seed treatment · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.