Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Alternate irrigation raised root weight density, root length density, and root-shoot ratio relative to conventional irrigation.

A claim from Root distribution and yield responses of wheat/maize intercropping to alternate irrigation in the arid areas of northwest China · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternate irrigation raised root weight density, root length density, and root-shoot ratio relative to conventional irrigation.

Treatment
AI treatmentse0
Outcome
root weight density (RWD), root length density (RLD) and root-shoot ratios (R/S)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional irrigation (CI) treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root weight density (RWD), root length density (RLD) and root-shoot ratios (R/S) in AI treatments were all higher than those in conventional irrigation (CI) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–805
t0

“wheat/maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–52

Title

Root distribution and yield responses of wheat/maize intercropping to alternate irrigation in the arid areas of northwest China

C.H. Yang; Q. Chai; G.B. Huang Plant Soil and Environment 2010. doi:10.17221/251/2009-pse

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-0e07af96e0532882ecc3829436f726310fb0d1b922ad5a3d0f0d409e5136e2c4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

irrigation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

289 papers: 208 positive, 81 negative or no effect

207 papers in the same direction as this claim · 80 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

280 papers more in this group

See all 289 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.