Intervention effectmodel-written summary

2,4-D at 1.25 kg a.i./ha increased income by Rs. 1024/ha over unweeded control.

A claim from Herbicidal Control of Weeds in Dwarf Wheat · 1981

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D at 1.25 kg a.i./ha increased income by Rs. 1024/ha over unweeded control.

Taxon
Dwarf WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
2,4-D (Na salt) at 1.25 kg a.i./hae1
Outcome
incomee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
Rs. 1024/hae1
Comparator
unweeded controle1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Terbutryne (Igran 80 WP) at 2.0 a.i./ha, as pre-emergence, (TOK at 3) Nitrofsn lit/ha and 2,4-D (Na salt) at 1.25 kg a.i./ha reduced the weed population by 95,77 and 80%, and increased the grain yield by 8, 9 and 8 q/ha over unweeded control respectively. The increased income was Rs. 549, Rs. 854 and Rs. 1024/ha respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–519
t0

“Weeds in Dwarf Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–42

Title

Herbicidal Control of Weeds in Dwarf Wheat

Utshav Pandey; Sarita Sahu; Sukhwinder Singh; et al. Indian Journal of Weed Science 1981

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-101bb88dd73b889fcb46b1b8775e3653931dd2d99d75d9f495c214efb4295f0d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this claim · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Mid-boot dicamba plus 2,4-D reduced wheat yield by 21%.

    Spring Wheat Response to Herbicides Applied at Three Growth Stages · 1990

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    2,4‐D during tillering reduced spikes per plant and spikelets per spike.

    RESPONSE OF SPRING WHEAT TO THE APPLICATION OF 2,4‐D AT VARIOUS GROWTH STAGES* · 1967

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Fall application of 2,4-D lowered Lennox yield relative to spring application.

    EFFECT OF TIME OF APPLICATION OF HERBICIDES ON YIELD OF THREE WINTER WHEAT CULTIVARS · 1990 · compared with spring-applied

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    2,4-D did not stop lentil growth and water use soon enough to prevent a reduction in subsequent wheat yield.

    Management practices for black lentil green manure for the semi-arid Canadian prairies · 1999

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Glyphosate plus 2,4-D did not affect wheat yields or grain test weights.

    Effects of Preplant Treatment Interval and Tillages on Herbicide Toxicity to Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 1991

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    2,4-D+glyphosate applied at milk grain to early dough stage reduced wheat yield.

    Yield, germination and herbicide residue in seeds of preharvest desiccated wheat · 2018

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Applying 2,4-D reduced wheat yield in both seasons regardless of application stage.

    WHEAT RESPONSE TO 2,4-D APPLICATION AT TWO GROWTH STAGES UNDER SEMI-ARID CONDITIONS · 2001

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Fluroxypyr 2,4-D tank mixture lowered wheat yield by 7%.

    Control of Wild Oat (Avena fatua) in Wheat with MKH 65621 · 2001

    Opposite direction

107 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.