Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The treatment increased number of pods plant-1 to 47.03 over farmers practice.

A claim from Effect of various levels of chickpea magic on yield, nutrient uptake and economics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment increased number of pods plant-1 to 47.03 over farmers practice.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF along with the foliar application of 1% chickpea magic at 45 DASe0
Outcome
number of pods plant-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
47.03e0
Comparator
farmers practicee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“economics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–115
e0

“number of pods plant-1 (47.03), pod yield plant-1 (28.24 g) and seed yield (18.53 q ha-1) were significantly higher in the treatment which received 100% RDF along with the foliar application of 1% chickpea magic at 45 DAS over the farmers practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–984

Title

Effect of various levels of chickpea magic on yield, nutrient uptake and economics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Vidya VS; Rudragouda FC; Naveen NE International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i11sf.2041

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-125c432185acc5062bbe311b37ce87388fdfe145b3aaf29c8c1d66f5e78ffd5b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

177 papers: 173 positive, 4 negative or no effect

172 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

168 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

336 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.