Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The treatment gave higher gross returns, net returns and BC ratio.

A claim from Effect of nano urea on nutrient uptake and economics of pearl millet · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment gave higher gross returns, net returns and BC ratio.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
75% RDN as basal + nano urea spray @ 4.0 ml l-1 at 30 and 45 DASe0
Outcome
gross returns, net returns and BC ratioe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 75% RDN as basal + nano urea spray @ 4.0 ml l-1 at 30 and 45 DAS recorded significantly higher uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (12.7, 43.4 and 56.1 kg ha-1, respectively) and higher gross returns, net returns and BC ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–632
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68

Title

Effect of nano urea on nutrient uptake and economics of pearl millet

Likhita Nekkanti; Hiremath KA; Manjunath .; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2025. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2025.v8.i3sa.2614

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-1bfdfdf35a0d34e5c5b6e7f206298486b7f861a577212bf7e06f29ba142f3c4d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

application · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 59 positive, 2 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

150 papers: 144 positive, 6 negative or no effect

143 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

141 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.