Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Slaked lime increased fruit black spot incidence versus control.

A claim from Growth and fruit quality of ‘Braeburn’ apple (Malus domestica) trees as influenced by fungicide programmes suitable for organic production · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Slaked lime increased fruit black spot incidence versus control.

Treatment
slaked limee0
Interactor
Venturia inaequalisVenturia inaequalise0pathogen
Outcome
Black spot (Venturia inaequalis) incidence on fruit at harveste0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Venturia inaequalis
Venturia inaequalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Black spot (Venturia inaequalis) incidence on fruit at harvest was significantly higher on trees treated with either Kocide DF or slaked lime compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1714–1890
t0

“apple (Malus domestica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–62

Title

Growth and fruit quality of ‘Braeburn’ apple (Malus domestica) trees as influenced by fungicide programmes suitable for organic production

J. W. Palmer; S. B. Davies; P. W. Shaw; et al. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 2003. doi:10.1080/01140671.2003.9514249

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-2004ec623fe4d04e24bc804d74d111f002de3de34ecccb5edcbe1a79a1502167 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

calcium dihydroxide · Venturia inaequalis · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.