Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sulfur-containing treatments significantly reduced leaf photosynthesis by up to almost 50% in January versus non-sulfur treatments.

A claim from Growth and fruit quality of ‘Braeburn’ apple (Malus domestica) trees as influenced by fungicide programmes suitable for organic production · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur-containing treatments significantly reduced leaf photosynthesis by up to almost 50% in January versus non-sulfur treatments.

Treatment
treatments which included sulfur (lime sulfur or Kumulus)e0
Outcome
Leaf photosynthesise0
Direction
reducede0
Value
almost 50%e0
Qualifier
in Januarye0
Comparator
non‐sulfur treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf photosynthesis was significantly reduced by all treatments which included sulfur (lime sulfur or Kumulus) with reductions of up to almost 50% in January compared to the non‐sulfur treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1062
t0

“apple (Malus domestica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–62

Title

Growth and fruit quality of ‘Braeburn’ apple (Malus domestica) trees as influenced by fungicide programmes suitable for organic production

J. W. Palmer; S. B. Davies; P. W. Shaw; et al. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 2003. doi:10.1080/01140671.2003.9514249

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-5c52063b3cacf0249671e8c4a6ea834d1a28f63223e864e90998a4cec43ff872 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

lime · physiology: photosynthesis · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.