Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitrogen absence increased allantoinase gene expression.

A claim from Functional Characterization of Allantoinase Genes from Arabidopsis and a Nonureide-Type Legume Black Locust · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen absence increased allantoinase gene expression.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Treatment
absence of nitrogen in the mediume0
Outcome
expression of the genese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The absence of nitrogen in the medium increased the expression of the genes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1025
t0

“Arabidopsis and a Nonureide-Type Legume Black Locust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–107

Title

Functional Characterization of Allantoinase Genes from Arabidopsis and a Nonureide-Type Legume Black Locust

Jaemo Yang; Kyung-Hwan Han PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 2004. doi:10.1104/pp.103.034637

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-252cce3568c8760082b201b779acdae8c8816e5330103a0df528160d87c99b5b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

in vitro · molecular: expression · ArabidopsisPositive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: expression · ArabidopsisPositive and negative results

18 papers: 6 positive, 12 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.