Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At a fixed fertilizer regime, profit ranked SRT above RT above CT above NT.

A claim from Optimizing tillage and fertilization practices to improve the carbon footprint and energy efficiency of wheat–maize cropping systems · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At a fixed fertilizer regime, profit ranked SRT above RT above CT above NT.

Taxon
wheat or maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayse0
Treatment
tillage patternse0
Outcome
profite0
Direction
SRT>RT>CT>NTe0
Comparator
NTe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Assuming the same fertilization regime, ranking the tillage patterns with respect to the value of the crop yield, the profit, the CF, the energy use efficiency (EUE) or the energy productivity (EP) for either wheat or maize always gave the following result: SRT>RT>CT>NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1128

Title

Optimizing tillage and fertilization practices to improve the carbon footprint and energy efficiency of wheat–maize cropping systems

Kun Han; Xinzhu Li; Liang Jia; et al. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jia.2024.03.026

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-25eade381a618bcfd2b97ee9b127dc136d128b5e033c2defd271d2f6694aa587 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.