Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping with cowpea significantly increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.

A claim from Chemical weed control in pigeonpea (Cajunus cajan) intercropped with short-duration grain legumes · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping with cowpea significantly increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
Intercrop cowpeae0
Outcome
yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercrop cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] effectively suppressed weed growth, arrested nutrient depletion and resulted in significant increase in yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea [Cajunus cajan (L.) Millsp.] in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–408

Title

Chemical weed control in pigeonpea (Cajunus cajan) intercropped with short-duration grain legumes

B. M. PATIL; JITENDRA PANDEY Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v41i4.3703

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-27a2264d97efa8d727baae3b6e430e9a0723e4666eaf90c6eea338b520fc029d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

108 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.