Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Glyphosate plus saflufenacil increased corn yield 69% through reduced ryegrass interference.

A claim from Control of annual ryegrass with spring-applied herbicides prior to seeding corn · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate plus saflufenacil increased corn yield 69% through reduced ryegrass interference.

Treatment
tankmix of glyphosate (1350 a.e. ha −1 ) +saflufenacil (25 g a.i. ha −1 )e0
Interactor
annual ryegrasse1weed
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
69%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced ARG interference with the tankmix of glyphosate (1350 a.e. ha −1 ) +saflufenacil (25 g a.i. ha −1 ) increased corn yield 69%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1330
e1

“annual ryegrass (ARG) seeded in the fall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–152

Title

Control of annual ryegrass with spring-applied herbicides prior to seeding corn

Nader Soltani; Christy Shropshire; Peter H. Sikkema Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2020. doi:10.1139/cjps-2019-0189

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-2accfbd47a2367fee3fe5fcf1bf6abf912821ea4c6fd0c44a83ad0203f892600 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

glyphosate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

77 papers: 42 positive, 35 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.