Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Wheat seed primed in 0.4% Zn solution gave higher grains per spike, thousand grain weight and biological yield.

A claim from Effect of seed priming in Zn solutions on chickpea and wheat. · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat seed primed in 0.4% Zn solution gave higher grains per spike, thousand grain weight and biological yield.

Treatment
Seed primed in 0.4% Zn solutione0
Outcome
grains spike, thousand grain weight and biological yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed primed in 0.4% Zn solution resulted in higher grains spike, thousand grain weight and biological yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1199
e1

“In case of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–987

Title

Effect of seed priming in Zn solutions on chickpea and wheat.

Muhammad Arif; Muhammad Waqas; Khalid Nawab; et al. 8th African Crop Science Society Conference, El-Minia, Egypt, 27-31 October 2007 2007

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-2c8b1b2321c8a1915f1de4dc234df1723049b929be057ccd2016a1faa833e032 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

301 papers: 270 positive, 31 negative or no effect

269 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

292 papers more in this group

See all 301 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.