Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Chitosan, nanomagnetite and their combined action increased wheat plant growth, root and shoot length.

A claim from Nanomagnetite and Chitosan Affect Seed Germination and Growth of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan, nanomagnetite and their combined action increased wheat plant growth, root and shoot length.

Treatment
chitosan, nanomagnetite, and combined actione1
Outcome
plant growth, root, and shoot lengthe1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“An increase in plant growth, root, and shoot length of plants was found in all seed treatment methods (chitosan, nanomagnetite, and combined action)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–699
t0

“Growth of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–70

Title

Nanomagnetite and Chitosan Affect Seed Germination and Growth of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)

Aksana Parfenova; Elena Lasareva; Natalya Azovtseva; et al. Letters in Applied NanoBioScience 2020. doi:10.33263/lianbs102.22792288

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-2d02206de9e03450020703b37c2530639cc4a155da5586207cd4b1bea596944b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

chitosan · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 146 positive, 22 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

159 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.