Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitrogen at higher doses applied after irrigation increased vegetation growth of wheat.

A claim from EFFECT OF DIFFERENT NITROGEN SOURCES OF WHEAT AND MAIZE YEALDS · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at higher doses applied after irrigation increased vegetation growth of wheat.

Treatment
application of nitrogen at high er doses after irrigatione1
Outcome
vegetation growthe1
Direction
increasinge1
Comparator
other treatmentse2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT AND MAIZE YEALDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–62
e1

“application of nitrogen at high er doses after irrigation led to increasing vegetation growth of both wheat and maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–937
e2

“the same treatment produced the highest values of straw, grain yields, biological yield and harvest index of both wheat and maize compared to the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1107

Title

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT NITROGEN SOURCES OF WHEAT AND MAIZE YEALDS

M.S. Awaad; M. A. El shazly; M. B. Taha; et al. Menoufia Journal of Soil Science 2020. doi:10.21608/mjss.2020.171534

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-2d34d162c5920275d1897dde92928d638969de44e2056c0093b7b27010f89095 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Soil water level had no effect on main stem development rate.

    Estimation of Spring Wheat Leaf Growth Rates and Anthesis from Air Temperature1 · 1984

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Increasing irrigation water salinity lowered shoot dry matter, particularly without zinc sulfate.

    Salinity and Zinc Application Effects on Phytoavailability of Cadmium and Zinc · 2004

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Aboveground biomass was similar under subsurface drip and flood irrigation.

    Water-Saving Potential of Subsurface Drip Irrigation For Winter Wheat · 2019 · compared with flood irrigation

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil inhibited wheat growth and development.

    Collaborative Impact of Compost and Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Soil Properties, Physiological Attributes, and Productivity of Wheat Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in Salt Affected Soil · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Two irrigations inhibited root growth into deeper soil layers.

    Irrigation and Nitrogen Regimes Promote the Use of Soil Water and Nitrate Nitrogen from Deep Soil Layers by Regulating Root Growth in Wheat · 2018

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Soil water treatment had no effect on kernel growth rate.

    Water and Nitrogen Effects on Winter Wheat in the Southeastern Coastal Plain: I. Grain Yield and Kernel Traits · 1995

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Restricted water supply reduced shoot and root biomass in wheat.

    Early Season Drought Largely Reduces Grain Yield in Wheat Cultivars with Smaller Root Systems · 2019

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Crop and water treatment had no significant effect on wheat growth parameters.

    Intercropping of Faba Bean with Wheat Under Low Water Availability Promotes Faba Bean Nodulation and Root Growth in Deeper Soil Layers · 2015

    Opposite direction

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this claim · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    High ammonium inhibited wheat cell growth.

    The Effects of Amino Acids and Ammonium on the Growth of Plant Cells in Suspension Culture · 1970

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Urea added to ZnO foliar spray had no effect on shoot growth.

    Zinc Mobility in Wheat: Uptake and Distribution of Zinc Applied to Leaves or Roots · 2001

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    When wheat received nitrate rather than ammonium, CO2 enhancement of shoot growth was halved.

    Nitrogen assimilation and growth of wheat under elevated carbon dioxide · 2002

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Nitrogen treatment had little effect on the rate of apical development.

    Leaf Emergence, Tiller Growth, and Apical Development of Nitrogen‐Dificient Spring Wheat · 1993

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    High nitrogen levels increased stem height in winter wheat.

    The effect of nitrogen and growth regulators on stem and root characteristics associated with lodging in two cultivars of winter wheat · 1995

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Nitrogen application caused excessive lodging in Gage.

    Nitrate Reductase Activity and its Relationship to Accumulation of Vegetative and Grain Nitrogen in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)1 · 1973

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Increasing nitrogen significantly increased lodging risk.

    Effect of nitrogen levels and nitrogen ratios on lodging resistance and yield potential of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2017

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    fertilizer N rate had no effect on main stem development rate.

    Estimation of Spring Wheat Leaf Growth Rates and Anthesis from Air Temperature1 · 1984

    Opposite direction

542 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.