Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Omega herbicide increased pod weight, seeds per plant, and seed yield compared with control and goal herbicide.

A claim from Effect of Planting Dates and Weed Control Treatments on Soybean Yield and Its Components · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omega herbicide increased pod weight, seeds per plant, and seed yield compared with control and goal herbicide.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
spraying omega herbicidee0
Outcome
weight of pods, No. of seeds/plant and seed yield/fede0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
their control and the goal herbicide applicatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Each of the weed control treatments as spraying omega herbicide and application of hand hoeing twice increased weight of pods, No. of seeds/plant and seed yield/fed compared to their control and the goal herbicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–961
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–63

Title

Effect of Planting Dates and Weed Control Treatments on Soybean Yield and Its Components

Asmaa Hamoda Annals of Agricultural Science Moshtohor 2021. doi:10.21608/assjm.2021.176313

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-2f0cff5c2528841bf49b304389b220adb353f4c8622f240f522597fff64de279 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

application · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

404 papers: 332 positive, 72 negative or no effect

331 papers in the same direction as this claim · 66 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Vapor and/or spray drift that caused soybean terminal bud kill reduced soybean yields.

    Dicamba Volatility · 1979

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Foliar fungicides did not affect soybean seed yield.

    Effect of Fungicide on Soybean Growth and Yield · 2009

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Foliar 2,4-D had little effect on soybean yield at prebloom.

    Response of Soybeans to 2,4-D, Dicamba, and Picloram · 1969

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Foliar fertilization did not significantly affect seed yield.

    Effect of Foliar Fertilization on Photosynthesis, Leaf Nutrition, and Yield of Soybeans1 · 1978

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    K-polyphosphate mix foliar spraying reduced soybean yield by 10.9% on average over two sites.

    Foliage Injury, Nutrient Intake, and Yield of Soybeans as Influenced by Foliar Fertilization1 · 1980

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Mineral N applied at the R5.3 stage, foliar or as topdressing, did not increase soybean grain yield in four field experiments.

    Mineral nitrogen impairs the biological nitrogen fixation in soybean of determinate and indeterminate growth types · 2017

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Soil or foliar Fe or Mn did not change soybean root or shoot dry matter yield.

    Influence of foliar and soil applications of iron and manganese on soybean dry matter yield and iron-manganese relationship in a Calcareous soil · 2011

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Preharvest treatments, spray volume, and surfactant concentration did not affect soybean yield or harvestable losses.

    Herbicide Combinations for Preharvest Weed Desiccation in Early Maturing Soybean (Glycine max) · 1998

    Opposite direction

395 papers more in this group

See all 404 papers →

herbicide · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

460 papers: 322 positive, 138 negative or no effect

321 papers in the same direction as this claim · 112 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Hoeing and recommended herbicide rates increased soybean yield and yield attributes.

    Growth, nodulation, and yield of soybean and associated weeds as affected by weed management · 2008

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    In 1989, under low weed densities, mechanical weed control systems gave soybean yields similar to the weed-free control.

    Integrated Weed Management Techniques to Reduce Herbicide Inputs in Soybean · 1992 · compared with weed‐free control

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    The seedbed tillage method and herbicide treatments did not significantly affect soybean yields in 1976.

    Seedbed Tillage and Herbicide Influence on Soybean (Glycine max) Weed Control and Yield · 1979

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    The highest herbicide rates reduced yield for most crops.

    Cotton, Peanut, and Soybean Response to Sublethal Rates of Dicamba, Glufosinate, and 2,4-D · 2012

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    R2 application caused greater yield loss than V3 for herbicides other than 2,4-D amine.

    Influence of Application Timings and Sublethal Rates of Synthetic Auxin Herbicides on Soybean · 2014 · compared with V3 stage of growth

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Single reduced-rate herbicide applications gave soybean yields equal to full rates.

    Integrating Reduced Rates of Postemergence Herbicides and Cultivation for Broadleaf Weed Control in Soybeans (Glycine max) · 1990 · compared with full rates

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Withholding herbicides affected corn/soybean rotation yields negligibly regardless of tillage.

    Weed Seed Populations in Ridge and Conventional Tillage · 1988

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    At labeled rates, neither herbicide affected yield in either year except sulfentrazone on P9305 in 1999.

    Phytotoxic Response and Yield of Soybean (Glycine max) Varieties Treated with Sulfentrazone or Flumioxazin1 · 2001

    Opposite direction

451 papers more in this group

See all 460 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.