Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation increased grape saplings survival by 12,0-27,1 %.

A claim from О возможности применения отечественных элиситоров в технологии возделывания винограда в аспекте импортозамещения · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation increased grape saplings survival by 12,0-27,1 %.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
root inoculation with Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie0
Interactor
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
grape saplings survivale0
Direction
growthe0
Value
12,0-27,1 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Sapling root inoculation with Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi positively infl uenced the environmental stress adaptation of the plant, which was observed as an increased kidney blooming dynamics which was 1,3-2 times higher in comparison with control; and the initial foliage growth dynamics was 1,3-2 times more intensive in the fi rst two weeks after planting comparing with the control. Biological activity effi ciency of the elevated grape plant part was apparent; the leaf surface area was expanded by 14,0-42,1 %, the scion average length pulled out by 10,8-28,5 %, leaf surface area growing was signifi cantly more intensive in June-August period. Risogenesis was stimulated – the total number of roots increased by 1,3-1,6 times, 2 mm roots increased by 1,2-2,6 times, the total thickness of roots increased by 1,3-1,8 times. Microbiological activity growth of the soil rhizosphere was observed: the quantity of ammonifi ers grew by 1,6 times, mineral nitrogen immobilisers increased more than by 2,5 times, oligonitrofi ls – by 3,1 times, pedotrofs – by 3, 5 times, micromycetes – by 1,7 times. Steady growth of grape saplings survival in the nursery in environmental stressful conditions is recorded (12,0-27,1 %) as well as an increased standard saplings exit (by 19-24 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–1950

Title

О возможности применения отечественных элиситоров в технологии возделывания винограда в аспекте импортозамещения

Nenko N, I.; Ilina I, A.; Sundyreva M, A.; et al. Russian Agency for Digital Standardization 2016. doi:10.18454/vstisp.2016.4.2843

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-2f790462c00103eb51854affe6fdb43cc9551678ed9cef47abaf0bf760d3b120 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

mycorrhiza · survival · VitisResults differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

inoculation · survival · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.