Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Extended extract exposure did not affect wireworm survival, feeding vigor or preference.

A claim from Butterfly milkweed extract as a feeding deterrent of the wireworm, Melanotus communis · 1985

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extended extract exposure did not affect wireworm survival, feeding vigor or preference.

Treatment
Extended exposure of wireworms to the extracte0
Interactor
Melanotus communis Gylle1pest
Outcome
wireworms to the extract did not affect their survival, feeding vigor, or preferencee0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extended exposure of wireworms to the extract did not affect their survival, feeding vigor, or preference in subsequent feeding tests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–528
e1

“corn wireworm, Melanotus communis Gyll”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–157
e2

“Seed corn treated with crude extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–566

Title

Butterfly milkweed extract as a feeding deterrent of the wireworm, Melanotus communis

Michael Villani; Fred Gould Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 1985. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.1985.tb03458.x

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-30922f495592e6095cee9dac7fadb4adda3e50ddf0ebc2aefcc076bf35a59a40 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

botanical · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 78 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 78 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.