Intervention effectmodel-written summary

P and Zn, especially combined, decreased the grain phytate to Zn ratio in both maize genotypes.

A claim from Zinc bioavailability in maize grains in response of phosphorous–zinc interaction · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P and Zn, especially combined, decreased the grain phytate to Zn ratio in both maize genotypes.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Application of P and Zn particularly in combinatione0
Outcome
grain [phytate] : [Zn] ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P and Zn particularly in combination decreased the grain [phytate] : [Zn] ratio and increased the estimated human Zn bioavailability in grains based on a trivariate model of Zn absorption in both maize genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1151

Title

Zinc bioavailability in maize grains in response of phosphorous–zinc interaction

Muhammad Imran; Abdur Rehim; Nadeem Sarwar; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 2015. doi:10.1002/jpln.201500441

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-333f5fdd5fcfe09732d3994bf8ef06330ddbf68d87cd2b74d70f6bb73442112c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 36 positive, 8 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

phosphorus · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 29 positive, 21 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.