Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T11 produced higher pod yield (45.17q ha-1) than the remaining treatments in groundnut.

A claim from Response of Organic Plant Nutrient Sources on Productivity and Profitability of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and Soil Fertility under Humid Zone of Southern Rajasthan · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 produced higher pod yield (45.17q ha-1) than the remaining treatments in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
FYM+ rock phosphate + gypsum + biofertilizers + BD 500 (T11)e0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
45.17q ha-1e0
Comparator
rest treatmentse0
Setting
Southern Rajasthant0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Organic Plant Nutrient Sources on Productivity and Profitability of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and Soil Fertility under Humid Zone of Southern Rajasthan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–169
e0

“Results revealed that combined application of FYM+ rock phosphate + gypsum + biofertilizers + BD 500 (T11) produced higher plant height (79.33cm), pods (42.0 plant-1), kernels (2.02 pod-1), test weight of kernels (347g), pod yield (45.17q ha-1), kernel yield (34.48q ha-1), haulm yield (7633kg ha-1), and shelling (73.22%) followed by T6 –T10 in the case of plant height, kernel test weight, haulm yield and shelling per cent and T7-T10 in case of pod, kernel yield,T8-T10 in case of pods plant-1, T10 in case of kernels plant-1 and found significantly superior over rest treatments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–1071

Title

Response of Organic Plant Nutrient Sources on Productivity and Profitability of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and Soil Fertility under Humid Zone of Southern Rajasthan

Har gilas International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.712.235

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-3be142fd7ecda7259d39c1be8d7daf3fa4a199e774748444c6aa32c922f47eea · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

178 papers: 160 positive, 18 negative or no effect

159 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    The highest combined N and P rates gave lower grain yield of groundnut than the combined application of 15 kg N and 46 kg P2O5.

    Effect of starter nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer rates on yield and yield components, grain protein content of groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea L.) and residual soil nitrogen content in a semiarid north Ethiopia · 2020 · compared with combined application of 15 kg N

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    P did not improve groundnut yields over the control.

    Groundnut Response to Ash, Phosphorus, Lime and Tillage in Southern Cameroon · 2002 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    10 kg P was ineffective for yield.

    Effect of Soil Amendments with Organic and Inorganic Manures on the Incidence of Dry Root Rot of Groundnut · 1996

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Phosphorus did not increase groundnut yields on the soil under forest vegetation.

    Fertilizer Studies with Groundnuts on the Brown Sands of Guyana. II. Effect of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium, and Gypsum and Timing of Phosphorus Application1 · 1975

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Soil phosphorus application did not significantly change Spanish peanut yield.

    Benefit of foliar spray phosphorus on peanuts in relation to gypsum and phosphorus application to soil · 1989

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    The commercial nutrient and fulvic acid blend did not affect peanut yield.

    Peanut response to a commercial blend of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and fulvic acid · 2022

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Partial factor productivity, agro-physiological efficiency and physiological efficiency decreased with phosphorus rates.

    Effect of Phosphorus on Yield, Nutrient Acquisition and Use Efficiency of Groundnut in West Bengal, India · 2020

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Phosphorus application had no detected effect on groundnut grain yield.

    Incorporating groundnut into the maize-based smallholder farming systems in semi-arid Limpopo province, RSA. · 2010

    Opposite direction

169 papers more in this group

See all 178 papers →

lime · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 133 positive, 9 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    At Plains, gypsum rates did not change peanut yield, SMK or ELK.

    Effect of Gypsum on Yield, Grade and Incidence of Pod Rot in Five Peanut Cultivars1 · 1980

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Gypsum had no significant effect on yield, grade or gross return on Tifton soil.

    Gypsum material effects on peanut and soil calcium · 1989

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Gypsum up to 1792 kg/ha at early bloom did not raise yields.

    AGRONOMIC ASPECTS OF PEANUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.) PRODUCTION IN ONTARIO · 1980

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Lime did not significantly increase crop yield.

    [Effect of long-term fertilization on crop yield and soil fertility of upland red soil]. · 2004

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Gypsum had no effect on peanut yield.

    Etiology of Peanut Pod Rot in Nicaragua: II. The Role of Pythium myriotylum as Defined by Applications of Gypsum and Fungicides · 2010

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Topdressing phosphatic fertilizer and gypsum at 60 days lowered yield significantly relative to basal application.

    Effect of phosphatic fertilizers, gypsum and their mode of application on yield, oil and protein content of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) · 2001 · compared with conventional basal application

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Gypsum did not increase peanut yield.

    Etiology of Peanut Pod Rot in Nicaragua: I. The Effect of Pod Size, Calcium, Fungicide, and Nematicide · 2010

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Lime slurry and dry lime at equivalent rates had identical effects on peanut yields.

    Effects of a Lime Slurry on Soil pH, Exchangeable Calcium, and Peanut Yields · 1979 · compared with dry lime

    No difference from an alternative

133 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

inoculation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

221 papers: 198 positive, 23 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Neither inoculation type significantly increased pod yield.

    Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) response to inoculation with Bradyrhizobium sp. in soils of Argentina · 2006

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Peanut plants inoculated only with M. phaseolina had the lowest production, 0.67 ± 0.01 t/ha−1.

    Biological Control of Charcoal Rot in Peanut Crop through Strains of Trichoderma spp., in Puebla, Mexico · 2021

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Herbicides, nematicide, and inoculant had no significant effect on peanut yield, sound mature kernels, or ether extract.

    Effects of Herbicides, a Nematicide and Rhizobium Inoculant on Yield, Chemical Composition and Nodulation of Starr Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.)1 · 1976

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    G. et. had no significant effect on the harvest index of groundnut at the respective stages.

    Influence of growth stage on the association between some tropical legumes and two variant species ofGlomusin an andosol · 1995

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    GRD graft inoculation reduced dry haulm weight, and seed yield.

    Varietal Response to Groundnut Rosette Disease and the First Report of Groundnut ringspot virus in Ghana · 2015 · compared with healthy plants

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    S. rolfsii inoculation decreased pod yield in all experiments.

    Additive Effects of Meloidogyne arenaria and Sclerotinin rolfsii on Peanut. · 1996

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Inoculating peanut on new land in Alabama produced no yield response compared with the uninoculated control.

    Inoculation of Peanuts on Farmers' Fields in Alabama1 · 1983 · compared with uninoculated control

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Rhizobial inoculation did not enhance pod yield of groundnut in the inoculation experiments.

    N2 fixation of groundnut in the eastern region of South Vietnam. · 2002

    Opposite direction

212 papers more in this group

See all 221 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.