Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Residual nitrate was not influenced by rotation type in spring wheat.

A claim from Spring Wheat Production and Associated Pests in Conventional and Diversified Cropping Systems in North Central Montana · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual nitrate was not influenced by rotation type in spring wheat.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivume5
Treatment
rotation typee1
Outcome
residual nitratee1
Direction
not influencede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Preplant soil water was less in diversified rotations, but residual nitrate was not influenced by rotation type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–798
e5

“Spring wheat yield, tiller density, and test weight were greater in conventional rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1205

Title

Spring Wheat Production and Associated Pests in Conventional and Diversified Cropping Systems in North Central Montana

Andrew W. Lenssen; Dan S. Long; William E. Grey; et al. Crop Management 2013. doi:10.1094/cm-2013-0017-rs

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-44bc8a37da7fcc6c8431d92f029fa751518a66993c41bb1f45eed5a5b8e2a5ad · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

rotation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 25 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.