Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined grain and soil fertilization with foliar application at tillering and stem elongation gave the highest spring wheat selenium content, 0.696 mg·kg−1 Se.

A claim from Agrotechnical Biofortification as a Method to Increase Selenium Content in Spring Wheat · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined grain and soil fertilization with foliar application at tillering and stem elongation gave the highest spring wheat selenium content, 0.696 mg·kg−1 Se.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
grain and soil fertilization combined with foliar application at the stage of tillering and stem elongatione0
Outcome
selenium contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.696 mg·kg−1 See0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain and soil fertilization combined with foliar application at the stage of tillering and stem elongation (G + S + F1-2) for which the highest selenium content was obtained (0.696 mg·kg−1 Se).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1160
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87

Title

Agrotechnical Biofortification as a Method to Increase Selenium Content in Spring Wheat

Aleksandra Radawiec; Wiesław Szulc; Beata Rutkowska Agronomy 2021. doi:10.3390/agronomy11030541

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-4590d72be006debc6af6553508dd1dc2bfe3d80bb11a9637716a94843eae16e8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

tillage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 119 positive, 26 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this claim · 24 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

136 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

266 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this claim · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

950 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.