Intervention effectmodel-written summary

NPK+FYM increased grain yield by 78.9%.

A claim from Comparative Analysis of Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Boro Rice under Long-term Inorganic and Organic Fertilization Practices · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK+FYM increased grain yield by 78.9%.

Taxon
Boro Ricet0
Treatment
NPK+FYMe0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
78.9%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield increased by 24.8%, 85.8%, 40.7%, 68.9%, 29.2%, 33.2%, 107.1%, 28.9% and 78.9% due to N, NP, NK, NPK, NS, NSZn, NPKSZn, NZn and NPK+FYM treatments respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1323
e1

“Grain yield increased by 24.8%, 85.8%, 40.7%, 68.9%, 29.2%, 33.2%, 107.1%, 28.9% and 78.9% due to N, NP, NK, NPK, NS, NSZn, NPKSZn, NZn and NPK+FYM treatments respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1323
t0

“Boro Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60

Title

Comparative Analysis of Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Boro Rice under Long-term Inorganic and Organic Fertilization Practices

Thashin Tabassum; Rashma Afrose; Md. Abdul Kader International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2024. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i115123

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-4cdd13efd55bb4c8fc32666d45d8a21598786e5afce16f358808953979758f88 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this claim · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

3,446 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.