Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Furrow bed planting significantly increased water productivity versus flat planting.

A claim from Effect of crop establishment methods and irrigation schedules on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow bed planting significantly increased water productivity versus flat planting.

Treatment
furrow-irrigated bed planting systemse0
Outcome
productivity of watere0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
flat planting with row spacing of 22.5 cme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that by following furrow-irrigated bed planting systems, 903 904 on an average, 40% water was saved as compared to 1 flat planting with row spacing of 22.5 cm with significant increase in the productivity of water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–956
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–110

Title

Effect of crop establishment methods and irrigation schedules on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum)

VIPIN KUMAR SAGAR; R.K. NARESH Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v64i2.5256

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-525b753220fc73fdb90ec922593e6dfa903e647a478975ad0bdff2a76e1becdd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.