Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Flour from hypoxia-stored wheat had a relatively complete gluten network structure.

A claim from Effects of Modified Atmosphere Storage With Different Oxygen Concentrations on Wheat Quality · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flour from hypoxia-stored wheat had a relatively complete gluten network structure.

Treatment
hypoxic atmospheree1
Outcome
gluten network structure of wheat floure6
Direction
relatively completee6
Comparator
conventional air (control)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–92
e0

“conventional air (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–638
e1

“The content of reactive oxygen species in wheat seeds stored in a hypoxic atmosphere (98% N 2 + 2% O 2 , P O2 = 2.03 kPa) was the lowest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–901
e6

“the gluten network structure of wheat flour stored in a hypoxic environment was relatively complete”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1217

Title

Effects of Modified Atmosphere Storage With Different Oxygen Concentrations on Wheat Quality

Bang‐Bang Li; Sheng‐Ze Jiao; Wei Zhang; et al. Cereal Chemistry 2025. doi:10.1002/cche.70029

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-599f2ebd12e03383b1286f1edacecd5e8aafc3b202265a046374910dfaa28f97 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

flooding · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 2 positive, 10 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.