Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pre-waterlogging nitrogen marginally improved SPAD in both canola types.

A claim from Optimizing Nitrogen Supplementation: Timing Strategies to Mitigate Waterlogging Stress in Winter- and Spring-Type Canola · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-waterlogging nitrogen marginally improved SPAD in both canola types.

Treatment
nitrogen application one week prior to the onset of waterlogginge0
Outcome
soil plant analysis development (SPAD) valuese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen application one week prior to the onset of waterlogging marginally improved soil plant analysis development (SPAD) values in the two types of canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–948

Title

Optimizing Nitrogen Supplementation: Timing Strategies to Mitigate Waterlogging Stress in Winter- and Spring-Type Canola

Haochen Zhao; Onusha Sharmita; Abu Bakar Siddique; et al. Plants 2025. doi:10.3390/plants14172641

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-5fc95ee237feaaace72f9a2dcbac6f2a76b149a7bfafca3881eac3e011bf7fec · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

flooding · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 6 positive, 24 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 65 positive, 17 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.