Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soil plus foliar zinc methionine significantly increased maize zinc concentration over all other treatments in both soil types.

A claim from Soil and foliar application of zinc-methionine and zinc sulfate effects on growth and micronutrients enrichment in maize cultivated in lime-rich and poor soils · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil plus foliar zinc methionine significantly increased maize zinc concentration over all other treatments in both soil types.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
soil + foliar Zn methioninee0
Outcome
Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0
Setting
lime-rich and poor soilse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant increase in Zn concentration of maize signified soil + foliar Zn methionine's imperative functioning over all the treatments in lime-rich and poor soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1033

Title

Soil and foliar application of zinc-methionine and zinc sulfate effects on growth and micronutrients enrichment in maize cultivated in lime-rich and poor soils

Hanife Akça; Subhan Danish; Uzma Younis; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2022. doi:10.1080/01904167.2022.2046077

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-6552ca4ac25a040f919764ac514411ee0be6e864aab3562f7fd32a84472c791b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

235 papers: 199 positive, 36 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

226 papers more in this group

See all 235 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

152 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.