Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Somatic hybrids were resistant to Phytophthora parasitica toxin.

A claim from Intergeneric Somatic Hybrid Plants Between Citrus and Poncirus trifoliata and Evaluation of Their Root Rot Resistance · 1900

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Somatic hybrids were resistant to Phytophthora parasitica toxin.

Taxon
Citrus and Poncirus trifoliataCitrusCitrus trifoliatat0
Treatment
Inoculation of citrus Phytophthora parasitica Dastar toxine0
Interactor
Phytophthora parasiticaPhytophthora nicotianaee0pathogen
Outcome
somatic hybrids were resistante0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Citrus trifoliata
Citrus trifoliata · TaxonJebulon · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of citrus Phytophthora parasitica Dastar toxin on leaves of somatic hybrids and both parental genotypes showed that Page tangelo was moderately susceptible, and trifoliate orange was highly resistant while the somatic hybrids were resistant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–796
t0

“Citrus and Poncirus trifoliata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–73

Title

Intergeneric Somatic Hybrid Plants Between Citrus and Poncirus trifoliata and Evaluation of Their Root Rot Resistance

Wen Guo Zhiwu xuebao 1900

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-6737135ea3da1606840511d3b100e47cdec81d5ff34797dd7362911788e04558 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

Phytophthora nicotianae · disease · CitrusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pathogen product · disease · CitrusPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · disease · Citrus trifoliata (trifoliate orange)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.