Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined fertilization significantly increased the fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency of rice.

A claim from [Mechanisms for the increased fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency of rice in wheat-rice rotation system under combined application of inorganic and organic fertilizers]. · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilization significantly increased the fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency of rice.

Treatment
combined fertilizatione2
Outcome
fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency of ricee3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nitrogen use efficiency of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–72
e2

“Under the combined fertilization, the dynamics of soil nitrogen supply matched best the dynamics of rice nitrogen uptake and utilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–788
e3

“which promoted the nitrogen accumulation in rice plant and the increase of rice yield and biomass, and increased the fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency of rice significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–963

Title

[Mechanisms for the increased fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency of rice in wheat-rice rotation system under combined application of inorganic and organic fertilizers].

Yi-Ren Liu; Xiang Li; Jie Yu; et al. PubMed 2012

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-6a241a0639ce167f94ef56d5be7db07b07079f97f2f3ad5a9f16fa1485c02e63 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

211 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.