Claim · model-written summary
100-seed weight was significantly higher in irrigated than unirrigated plots.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- irrigated plotse0
- Outcome
- 100-seed weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- unirrigated controle0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly higher plant height, plant population, grains per pod, 100-seed weight, weeds count and weed dry matter were also recorded in irrigated plots than unirrigated control”
t0“chickpea”
Title
A.K. DIXIT; SUNIL KUMAR; ARVIND K. RAI; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v59i4.4572
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Intervention effect Reduced tillage yielded 1.74 t/ha chickpea grain, on par with conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect Reduced tillage raised chickpea harvest index to 57.7% versus 55.2% under conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage raised chickpea harvest index to 57.4% versus 55.2% under conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect One irrigation produced higher irrigation water-use efficiency of 295 kg grain /ha-cm.
- Intervention effect plant height was significantly higher in irrigated than unirrigated plots.
- Intervention effect plant population was significantly higher in irrigated than unirrigated plots.
- Intervention effect grains per pod was significantly higher in irrigated than unirrigated plots.
- Intervention effect weeds count was significantly higher in irrigated than unirrigated plots.
- Intervention effect weed dry matter was significantly higher in irrigated than unirrigated plots.
- Intervention effect Reduced tillage increased system chickpea-equivalent yield to 3.85 t/ha versus zero tillage.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage increased system chickpea-equivalent yield to 3.90 t/ha versus zero tillage.
- Intervention effect Reduced tillage gave higher whole-system net returns of 33.1 103/ha and benefit:cost ratio of 0.85.
- Intervention effect Two irrigations gave higher whole-system net returns of 34.6 103/ha and benefit:cost ratio of 0.87.
- Intervention effect After three years zero tillage lowered soil bulk density to 1.34 Mg/m3 relative to conventional and reduced tillage.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage increased soil total organic carbon to 10.31 g/kg.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage increased soil electrical conductivity to 0.20 dS/m.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage increased soil available N to 260.1 kg/ha.