Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the winter seasons (rabi) of 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 on sandy- loam soils at CCS Haryana Agricultural Univesity, Hisar, to study the effect of irrigation, sulphur and seed inoculation levels of growth, nodulation and yield of chickpea or gram (Cicer arietinum L.) variety 'HC 1' under late-sown conditions. Two irrigations at pre-flowering and pod-development stages gave 16.4 and 7.4% more seed yield over no irrigation and 1 irrigation given at pre-flowering stage respectively. Highest consumptive use of water was recorded with 2 irrigations, while maximum water-use efficiency (WUE) in the control. Application of 40 kg Slha resulted in better growth, yield attributes, yield, consumptive use, WUE and S uptake than no sulphur and 20 kg Slha. Inoculation with Rhizobium + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) significantly increased plant height, dry matter, nodulation, podslplant, yield, consumptive use, WUE and S uptake over single inoculation of Rhizobium or PSB and no inoculation; however, single inoculation with Rhizobium or PSB being at par were significantly superior over the control
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Two irrigations increased seed yield by 16.4% over no irrigation.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Two irrigations at pre-flowering and pod-development stagese0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 16.4e0
- Comparator
- no irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two irrigations at pre-flowering and pod-development stages gave 16.4 and 7.4% more seed yield over no irrigation and 1 irrigation given at pre-flowering stage respectively.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Two irrigations increased seed yield by 7.4% over one pre-flowering irrigation.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Two irrigations at pre-flowering and pod-development stagese0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 7.4%e0
- Comparator
- 1 irrigation given at pre-flowering stagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two irrigations at pre-flowering and pod-development stages gave 16.4 and 7.4% more seed yield over no irrigation and 1 irrigation given at pre-flowering stage respectively.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Two irrigations gave the highest consumptive water use.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 2 irrigationse0
- Outcome
- consumptive use of watere0
- Direction
- Higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Highest consumptive use of water was recorded with 2 irrigations”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The control gave maximum water-use efficiency.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- water-use efficiencye0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum water-use efficiency (WUE) in the control”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
40 kg Slha improved growth, yield attributes and yield relative to no or 20 kg Slha.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 40 kg Slhae0
- Outcome
- growth, yield attributes, yielde0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- no sulphur and 20 kg Slhae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 40 kg Slha resulted in better growth, yield attributes, yield, consumptive use, WUE and S uptake than no sulphur and 20 kg Slha.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
40 kg Slha improved consumptive water use, WUE and sulphur uptake relative to no or 20 kg Slha.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 40 kg Slhae0
- Outcome
- consumptive use, WUE and S uptakee0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- no sulphur and 20 kg Slhae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 40 kg Slha resulted in better growth, yield attributes, yield, consumptive use, WUE and S uptake than no sulphur and 20 kg Slha.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined Rhizobium and PSB inoculation significantly raised plant height, dry matter and nodulation versus single or no inoculation.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with Rhizobium + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB)e0
- Second interactor
- phosphate-solubilizing bacteriae0symbiont
- Outcome
- plant height, dry matter, nodulatione0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- single inoculation of Rhizobium or PSB and no inoculatione0
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with Rhizobium + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) significantly increased plant height, dry matter, nodulation, podslplant, yield, consumptive use, WUE and S uptake over single inoculation of Rhizobium or PSB and no inoculation”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined inoculation significantly raised pods per plant and yield versus single or no inoculation.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with Rhizobium + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB)e0
- Second interactor
- phosphate-solubilizing bacteriae0symbiont
- Outcome
- podslplant, yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- single inoculation of Rhizobium or PSB and no inoculatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with Rhizobium + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) significantly increased plant height, dry matter, nodulation, podslplant, yield, consumptive use, WUE and S uptake over single inoculation of Rhizobium or PSB and no inoculation”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined inoculation significantly raised water use, WUE and sulphur uptake versus single or no inoculation.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with Rhizobium + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB)e0
- Second interactor
- phosphate-solubilizing bacteriae0symbiont
- Outcome
- consumptive use, WUE and S uptakee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- single inoculation of Rhizobium or PSB and no inoculatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with Rhizobium + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) significantly increased plant height, dry matter, nodulation, podslplant, yield, consumptive use, WUE and S uptake over single inoculation of Rhizobium or PSB and no inoculation”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Single Rhizobium and PSB inoculations were at par and significantly exceeded no inoculation.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- single inoculation with Rhizobium or PSBe0
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- superiore0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“single inoculation with Rhizobium or PSB being at par were significantly superior over the control”
t0“chickpea”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
116 papers more in this group
See all 120 papers →Rhizobium · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →phosphorus · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
110 papers more in this group
See all 114 papers →irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
120 papers more in this group
See all 124 papers →phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
164 papers more in this group
See all 168 papers →inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
213 papers more in this group
See all 217 papers →phosphorus · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.