Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Plant height did not differ significantly by irrigation method.

A claim from IMPACT OF SPRINKLER IRRIGATION METHOD AND MINERAL FERTILIZER ON WHEAT PLANT · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height did not differ significantly by irrigation method.

Treatment
Sprinkler irrigatione0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Comparator
surface irrigatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Sprinkler irrigation showed significant differences compared to surface irrigation. The length of the spike , number of grain per spike ,1000 grains weight Number of spikes per square meter, grains weight per square meter and the harvest index, while the plant height was not significant only the study also showed that the correlation coefficient between the apparent characteristics of plants was stronger in the case of using sprinkler irrigation compared to the surface irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–1030
t0

“WHEAT PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75

Title

IMPACT OF SPRINKLER IRRIGATION METHOD AND MINERAL FERTILIZER ON WHEAT PLANT

Raji .A Mousa Alawadi; Ali Irfan Ilbas Revista Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias -FAGROPEC 2023. doi:10.47847/fagropec.v15n2a2

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-6f4ac775f24734af3491fbfc4f34be4b6fd1a7522d206908458029d873ad4d25 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this claim · 177 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.