Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Economic efficiency (cost-benefit ratio) was highest with 120 kg/ha and 350 kernels/m2.

A claim from THE EFFECTS OF SEEDING RATE, MINERAL FERTILIZATION AND A GROWTH REGULATOR ON THE ECONOMIC AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF DURUM WHEAT PRODUCTION · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Economic efficiency (cost-benefit ratio) was highest with 120 kg/ha and 350 kernels/m2.

Taxon
Triticum durum L.Triticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment
fertilizer rate of 120 kg·ha-1 and a seeding rate of 350 kernels·m-2e1
Outcome
economic efficiency (cost-benefit ratio)e1
Direction
higheste1
Value
2.32e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of various agronomic factors on the economic and energy efficiency of Triticum durum L. production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–289
e1

“The economic efficiency (cost-benefit ratio) was highest (2.32) in the production technology with a fertilizer rate of 120 kg·ha-1 and a seeding rate of 350 kernels·m-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1189

Title

THE EFFECTS OF SEEDING RATE, MINERAL FERTILIZATION AND A GROWTH REGULATOR ON THE ECONOMIC AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF DURUM WHEAT PRODUCTION

Kamila Sabina Bożek; Tomasz Winnicki; Krystyna Żuk‐Gołaszewska 2019

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-6f5e70a8624ddaaa33abb50edd908888f233a07af965f08db63f7f9207e5c265 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results differ

79 papers: 68 positive, 11 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

density · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.