Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The enriched vermicompost treatment gave the maximum benefit-cost ratio, 3.98.

A claim from Effect of enriched vermicompost on nutrient uptake and economics of baby corn (Zea mays L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The enriched vermicompost treatment gave the maximum benefit-cost ratio, 3.98.

Taxon
baby corn (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
vermicompost enriched with Azospirillum @ 10 kg ha-1 + PSB @ 10 kg ha-1 + FeSO₄ @ 10 kg ha-1 + ZnSO₄ @ 25 kg ha-1 + foliar spray of ZnSO₄ and FeSO₄ @ 0.5% at 45 DASe1
Outcome
B:Ce1
Direction
maximume1
Value
3.98e1
Comparator
control treatmente3
Setting
Agricultural Research Station, Dhadesugure0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“economics of baby corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–91
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Dhadesugur during kharif, 2024”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97
e1

“application of vermicompost enriched with Azospirillum @ 10 kg ha-1 + PSB @ 10 kg ha-1 + FeSO₄ @ 10 kg ha-1 + ZnSO₄ @ 25 kg ha-1 + foliar spray of ZnSO₄ and FeSO₄ @ 0.5% at 45 DAS recorded significantly higher nutrient uptake and maximum gross returns (₹ 2,80,410 ha-1), net returns (₹ 2,10,001 ha-1) and B:C (3.98)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–627
e3

“least nutrient uptake and economic returns were noticed in control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1112

Title

Effect of enriched vermicompost on nutrient uptake and economics of baby corn (Zea mays L.)

Mahammad Riyaz; Ramesha YM; Krishnamurthy D; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2025. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2025.v8.i10a.3952

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-708dcf783db2ce7592c22ec77d2e65a737fd15df18741a2ec79137228254bd31 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Azospirillum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

52 papers: 47 positive, 5 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

128 papers: 124 positive, 4 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
    M1 plus S8 was on par with M1 plus S4.

    Growth and Yield of Rabi Maize (Zea mays L.) at Different Planting Densities and N-Levels · 2017 · compared with M1 (1,00,000 plants ha-1) and S4 (300 kg N ha-1)

    No difference from an alternative

  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.