Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Six-stage irrigation produced maximum wheat grain yield.

A claim from EVALUATION OF PROMISING WHEAT VARIETIES UNDER DIFFERENT LEVELS OF IRRIGATION · 1991

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six-stage irrigation produced maximum wheat grain yield.

Treatment
Adequate irrigations at six growth stagese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adequate irrigations at six growth stages viz., crown root initiation (CRI), late tillering, late jointing, flowering, milk and dough stages produced maximum grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–379
t0

“WHEAT VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–39

Title

EVALUATION OF PROMISING WHEAT VARIETIES UNDER DIFFERENT LEVELS OF IRRIGATION

VENKITASWAMY R; RAMASAMI K.P; BALASUBRAMANIAN N; et al. Madras Agricultural Journal 1991. doi:10.29321/maj.10.a01876

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-7097f4e49c5fafcad2428653daa5825f34fc7dcf76efae4f8780c2f936ee933c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

stage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 95 positive, 65 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this claim · 63 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Heat from 15 days after anthesis reduced wheat grain yield by 18%.

    Yield Components of Wheat Grown under High Temperature Stress during Reproductive Growth · 1999

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Flowering heat reduced main-spike seed number by 15.4%.

    Quantifying the Impact of Heat Stress on Pollen Germination, Seed Set, and Grain Filling in Spring Wheat · 2019 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Water stress at both stages severely reduced yield and yield components.

    Growth And Yield Components Of Wheat Under Water Stress Of Different Growth Stages · 1970

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Continuous late high temperature did not negatively affect grain yield.

    Effect of the Duration and Intensity of Heat Shock During Grain Filling on Dry Matter and Protein Accumulation, Technological Quality and Protein Composition in Bread and Durum Wheat · 1997

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Waterlogging at the earliest growth stage gave the greatest reduction in root, herbage and grain yield.

    Effect of waterlogging on the growth, grain and straw yield of wheat, barley and oats · 1976

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Early water deficit reduced wheat grain weight by 10%.

    NUTRIENT UPTAKE, PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES, AND YIELD ATTRIBUTES OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUML.) EXPOSED TO EARLY AND LATE DROUGHT STRESS · 2012

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    An IW/PAN-E ratio of 0.75 produced as much grain yield as irrigation at five growth stages.

    Comparison of Irrigation Schedules Based on Pan Evaporation and Growth Stages in Winter Wheat1 · 1976 · compared with irrigation at five growth stages

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Drought applied at flowering produced the poorest wheat yield.

    Responses of Different Wheat Genotypes to Drought Stress Applied at Different Growth Stages · 2010

    Opposite direction

151 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Minimum irrigation lowered average winter wheat yield by 14% versus full irrigation.

    Performance of Double‐Cropped Winter Wheat–Summer Maize under Minimum Irrigation in the North China Plain · 2006 · compared with fully irrigated treatment (FI)

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Moderately saline water substituted for good quality water during part of the season maintained total wheat grain yield.

    Time of Salt Stress Affects Growth and Yield Components of Irrigated Wheat · 1994 · compared with good quality water

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Saline irrigation caused soil salinization and reduced wheat growth and yield.

    Effect of Straw Biochar on Soil Properties and Wheat Production under Saline Water Irrigation · 2019

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil reduced wheat productivity.

    Collaborative Impact of Compost and Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Soil Properties, Physiological Attributes, and Productivity of Wheat Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in Salt Affected Soil · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Wastewater irrigation decreased plant height, leaf area and grain yield in wheat.

    Effect of Wastewater Irrigation on Photosynthesis, Growth, and Anatomical Features of Two Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2020

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    An additional 33 mm of irrigation did not increase grain yield.

    Source–sink balance and manipulating sink–source relations of wheat indicate that the yield potential of wheat is sink-limited in high-rainfall zones · 2010

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    DI water saving had no effect on wheat yield.

    Yield and water productivity of maize and wheat under deficit and raised bed irrigation practices in Egypt · 2012

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Limited irrigation yielded 99% of full irrigation for winter wheat.

    Cropping Systems for Stretching Limited Irrigation Supplies · 1993 · compared with fully irrigated

    Opposite direction

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.