Intervention effectmodel-written summary

100-kernel weight and shelling out-turn were higher with water soluble fertilizer at 226.5 kg/ha through drip irrigation.

A claim from Improving productivity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) by using water soluble fertilizer through drip irrigation · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100-kernel weight and shelling out-turn were higher with water soluble fertilizer at 226.5 kg/ha through drip irrigation.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
water soluble fertilizer @ 226.5 kg/ha through drip irrigatione3
Outcome
100-kernel weight and shelling out-turne3
Direction
highere3
Setting
Junagadh, Gujarate0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Junagadh, Gujarat to im- prove productivity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–157
e3

“Similarly, number and weight of mature pods/plant, 100-kernel weight and shelling out-turn were also recorded higher with water soluble fertilizer @ 226.5 kg/ha through drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–780

Title

Improving productivity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) by using water soluble fertilizer through drip irrigation

N.K. JAIN; H.N. MEENA Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v60i1.4423

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-7431c81605ab871ed487ddfb77c303ad41d435908c178580e37062fa41b6858b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

191 papers: 168 positive, 23 negative or no effect

167 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Surface drip irrigation improved peanut yield over no irrigation.

    Peanut Yield, Market Grade, and Economics with Two Surface Drip Lateral Spacings · 2009 · compared with non-irrigated regimes

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Fertigation at 75% NK with 75% P through drip increased net returns by INR 13,499 per ha relative to 50% NK with 50% P.

    Drip fertigation and irrigation interval effects on growth, productivity, nutrient, and water economy in summer peanut · 2018 · compared with 50% NK through drip with 50% P in soil (F2)

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. positive
    Drip application of 100% NF at sowing (T10) significantly enhanced yield attributes relative to T1.

    Productivity, Profitability, Enzyme Activities and Nutrient Balance in Summer Peanut(Arachis hypogaea L.)as Influenced by NPK Drip Fertigation · 2021 · compared with T1

    Same directionCites this paper

  4. positive
    M3F5 produced significantly higher Dry Matter Production [DMP], leaf temperature, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index [NDVI] in groundnut.

    Response of indigenous low cost smart fertigation system on growth, physiology, root characters and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2025

    Same directionCites this paper

  5. negative
    Decreasing irrigation water significantly reduced yield components of groundnut.

    Induction of Tolerance in Groundnut Plants Against Drought Stress and Cercospora Leaf Spot Disease with Exogenous Application of Arginine and Sodium Nitroprusside Under Field Conditions · 2023 · compared with 100%

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Decreased irrigation significantly decreased peanut growth and yield relative to 100% irrigation.

    The Role of Carbon Nanotubes in Improving Drought Tolerance via Upregulation of the Physiological Processes of Peanut Plants Grown in Sandy Soils · 2024 · compared with 100%

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Irrigation frequency had an insignificant effect on peanut pod yield, which ranged from 602 to 651 g m-2.

    Irrigation Management of Peanut with a Moving Sprinkler System: Runoff, Yield, and Water Use Efficiency · 2005

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Irrigation had no major impact on peanut disease and yield.

    Peanut Disease Epidemiology Under Dynamic Microclimate Conditions and Management Practices in North Florida · 2021

    Opposite direction

182 papers more in this group

See all 191 papers →

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this claim · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Fertigation at 75% NK with 75% P through drip increased net returns by INR 13,499 per ha relative to 50% NK with 50% P.

    Drip fertigation and irrigation interval effects on growth, productivity, nutrient, and water economy in summer peanut · 2018 · compared with 50% NK through drip with 50% P in soil (F2)

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    M3F5 produced significantly higher Dry Matter Production [DMP], leaf temperature, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index [NDVI] in groundnut.

    Response of indigenous low cost smart fertigation system on growth, physiology, root characters and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2025

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. no effect
    Cover crop nitrogen fertilization did not influence peanut pod yield.

    Nitrogen Supply for Cover Crops and Effects on Peanut Grown in Succession under a No‐Till System · 2009

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Increasing the added amount of FYM significantly decreased peanut shelling percentage, pod number and seeds per pod.

    Fog water harvesting providing stability for small Bedwe communities lives in North cost of Egypt · 2016

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Peanut yields were unchanged by N fertilization.

    Nitrogen fertilization rates mediate rhizosphere soil carbon emissions of continuous peanut monoculture by altering cellulose-specific microbess · 2023

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Fertilizer rate did not significantly influence number of pods per plant, pod yield or seed yield.

    Response of Two Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Varieties to Sowing Date and NPK Fertilizer Rate in a Semi-Arid Environment: Yield and Yield Attributes · 2011

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Field nitrogen fertilization did not significantly affect seed yield of nodulated genotypes.

    Growth, Nitrogen Uptake, and Partitioning in Nitrogen‐Fertilized Nodulating and Nonnodulating Peanut1 · 1985

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    On both soils, fruit drop-off was higher on plots fertilized in the same year peanuts were grown.

    Effect of Time and Rate of Fertilizer Application on Yield and Seed‐Size of Jumbo Runner Peanuts1 · 1962

    Opposite direction

674 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.