Intervention effectmodel-written summary

M3F5 produced significantly higher Dry Matter Production [DMP], leaf temperature, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index [NDVI] in groundnut.

A claim from Response of indigenous low cost smart fertigation system on growth, physiology, root characters and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

M3F5 produced significantly higher Dry Matter Production [DMP], leaf temperature, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index [NDVI] in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
sensor-based automated drip irrigation combined with sensor-based fertigation at 100% NPK level (M3F5)e0
Outcome
Dry Matter Production [DMP], leaf temperature, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index [NDVI]e0
Direction
Significantly highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher growth (plant height), physiological parameters (Crop Growth Rate [CGR], Leaf Area Index [LAI], Relative Water Content [RWC], Dry Matter Production [DMP], leaf temperature, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index [NDVI] and SPAD meter value), root characteristics (number of nodules, root length, volume, and dry weight) and ultimately yield (pod and haulm yield) of groundnut were recorded under sensor-based automated drip irrigation combined with sensor-based fertigation at 100% NPK level (M3F5).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1906

Title

Response of indigenous low cost smart fertigation system on growth, physiology, root characters and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Chellamani Aathithyan; Arumugam Gurusamy; Elangovan Subramanian; et al. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 2025. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2025.1566364

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-7a79f2ea6b19eef32372010a54e73829925f8f34824a8c0f5204c58ae815cfa9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

191 papers: 168 positive, 23 negative or no effect

167 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    drip irrigation at 100% PE with fertigation at 100% RDF as WSF gave maximum pod yield of 3495 kg ha-1.

    Improving productivity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under drip and micro sprinkler fertigation system · 2018

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    100-kernel weight and shelling out-turn were higher with water soluble fertilizer at 226.5 kg/ha through drip irrigation.

    Improving productivity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) by using water soluble fertilizer through drip irrigation · 2001

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive
    Fertigation at 75% NK with 75% P through drip increased net returns by INR 13,499 per ha relative to 50% NK with 50% P.

    Drip fertigation and irrigation interval effects on growth, productivity, nutrient, and water economy in summer peanut · 2018 · compared with 50% NK through drip with 50% P in soil (F2)

    Same directionCited by this paper

  4. positive
    Drip application of 100% NF at sowing (T10) significantly enhanced yield attributes relative to T1.

    Productivity, Profitability, Enzyme Activities and Nutrient Balance in Summer Peanut(Arachis hypogaea L.)as Influenced by NPK Drip Fertigation · 2021 · compared with T1

    Same directionCited by this paper

  5. negative
    Decreasing irrigation water significantly reduced yield components of groundnut.

    Induction of Tolerance in Groundnut Plants Against Drought Stress and Cercospora Leaf Spot Disease with Exogenous Application of Arginine and Sodium Nitroprusside Under Field Conditions · 2023 · compared with 100%

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Decreased irrigation significantly decreased peanut growth and yield relative to 100% irrigation.

    The Role of Carbon Nanotubes in Improving Drought Tolerance via Upregulation of the Physiological Processes of Peanut Plants Grown in Sandy Soils · 2024 · compared with 100%

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Irrigation frequency had an insignificant effect on peanut pod yield, which ranged from 602 to 651 g m-2.

    Irrigation Management of Peanut with a Moving Sprinkler System: Runoff, Yield, and Water Use Efficiency · 2005

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Irrigation had no major impact on peanut disease and yield.

    Peanut Disease Epidemiology Under Dynamic Microclimate Conditions and Management Practices in North Florida · 2021

    Opposite direction

182 papers more in this group

See all 191 papers →

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this claim · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    drip irrigation at 100% PE with fertigation at 100% RDF as WSF gave maximum pod yield of 3495 kg ha-1.

    Improving productivity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under drip and micro sprinkler fertigation system · 2018

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    100-kernel weight and shelling out-turn were higher with water soluble fertilizer at 226.5 kg/ha through drip irrigation.

    Improving productivity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) by using water soluble fertilizer through drip irrigation · 2001

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive
    Fertigation at 75% NK with 75% P through drip increased net returns by INR 13,499 per ha relative to 50% NK with 50% P.

    Drip fertigation and irrigation interval effects on growth, productivity, nutrient, and water economy in summer peanut · 2018 · compared with 50% NK through drip with 50% P in soil (F2)

    Same directionCited by this paper

  4. no effect
    Cover crop nitrogen fertilization did not influence peanut pod yield.

    Nitrogen Supply for Cover Crops and Effects on Peanut Grown in Succession under a No‐Till System · 2009

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Increasing the added amount of FYM significantly decreased peanut shelling percentage, pod number and seeds per pod.

    Fog water harvesting providing stability for small Bedwe communities lives in North cost of Egypt · 2016

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Peanut yields were unchanged by N fertilization.

    Nitrogen fertilization rates mediate rhizosphere soil carbon emissions of continuous peanut monoculture by altering cellulose-specific microbess · 2023

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Fertilizer rate did not significantly influence number of pods per plant, pod yield or seed yield.

    Response of Two Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Varieties to Sowing Date and NPK Fertilizer Rate in a Semi-Arid Environment: Yield and Yield Attributes · 2011

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Field nitrogen fertilization did not significantly affect seed yield of nodulated genotypes.

    Growth, Nitrogen Uptake, and Partitioning in Nitrogen‐Fertilized Nodulating and Nonnodulating Peanut1 · 1985

    Opposite direction

674 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.